跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.04052 · v1

On the (Quantum) Communication Complexity of Secure MPC from a Random Oracle

首次提交 2026-11-03 06:46
版本更新 2026-11-03 06:46
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:40
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Information-theoretic MPC among $n$ parties with $t$ corruptions can securely evaluate a circuit $C$ with $O(|C| \cdot t/(n-t))$ online communication in the preprocessing model and $O(|C| \cdot t/(n-2t))$ communication in the honest majority setting. Damgård, Larsen and Nielsen (CRYPTO 2019) showed that both communication bounds are tight for inner products. Fully homomorphic encryption and other assumptions known to imply public-key cryptography beat both communication bounds, but the communication complexity with symmetric-key cryptography alone is less understood. For MPC with preprocessing, we prove that the same $Ω(|C| \cdot t/(n-t))$ lower bound holds in the random oracle model, so a random oracle cannot reduce the online communication. For honest majority MPC relative to a random oracle, we present an $Ω(|C|)$ communication lower bound that is matched by a new construction for degree-2 polynomials (including inner products) when $n = O(\log λ)$, beating the information-theoretic bound. We also study quantum MPC. First, we prove that information-theoretic protocols with quantum communication (and preprocessing) cannot reduce communication compared to their classical counterparts. Furthermore, we extend our lower bound for MPC with preprocessing to protocols with a quantum-accessible random oracle, but use only classical communication. In contrast, with both quantum communication and a post-quantum one-way function, we present a simple two-party protocol that evaluates the two-party instance of these circuits with $\mathrm{poly}(λ, \log |C|)$ communication, beating these lower bounds. Finally, such communication savings do not come for free. We prove that there exist circuits $C$ such that every blackbox protocol with $o(|C|)$ quantum communication must perform $Ω(|C|)$ cryptographic operations.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-03 06:46 · 最新观测版本

On the (Quantum) Communication Complexity of Secure MPC from a Random Oracle

Information-theoretic MPC among $n$ parties with $t$ corruptions can securely evaluate a circuit $C$ with $O(|C| \cdot t/(n-t))$ online communication in the preprocessing model and $O(|C| \cdot t/(n-2t))$ communication in the honest majority setting. Damgård, Larsen and Nielsen (CRYPTO 2019) showed that both communication bounds are tight for inner products. Fully homomorphic encryption and other assumptions known to imply public-key cryptography beat both communication bounds, but the communication complexity with symmetric-key cryptography alone is less understood. For MPC with preprocessing, we prove that the same $Ω(|C| \cdot t/(n-t))$ lower bound holds in the random oracle model, so a random oracle cannot reduce the online communication. For honest majority MPC relative to a random oracle, we present an $Ω(|C|)$ communication lower bound that is matched by a new construction for degree-2 polynomials (including inner products) when $n = O(\log λ)$, beating the information-theoretic bound. We also study quantum MPC. First, we prove that information-theoretic protocols with quantum communication (and preprocessing) cannot reduce communication compared to their classical counterparts. Furthermore, we extend our lower bound for MPC with preprocessing to protocols with a quantum-accessible random oracle, but use only classical communication. In contrast, with both quantum communication and a post-quantum one-way function, we present a simple two-party protocol that evaluates the two-party instance of these circuits with $\mathrm{poly}(λ, \log |C|)$ communication, beating these lower bounds. Finally, such communication savings do not come for free. We prove that there exist circuits $C$ such that every blackbox protocol with $o(|C|)$ quantum communication must perform $Ω(|C|)$ cryptographic operations.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗