← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.04057 · v1
Look Before You Launch: Learned Throughput Prediction for Hardware Selection in a Production Training Fleet
首次提交 2026-11-03 07:02
版本更新 2026-11-03 07:02
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:40
摘要
In mixed-vendor accelerator fleets, many training jobs can run on several hardware types, and the best choice depends on each job's throughput on each type. Routing a job needs a throughput estimate for every candidate type before the job runs. We present LEAP, a machine learning performance prediction service that predicts each training job's throughput on every candidate hardware type at submission time and ranks the candidates by predicted throughput per unit cost. It routes tens of thousands of training job attempts a day across hundreds of different model types and more than 20 hardware types in a production fleet. LEAP predicts throughput from submission-time training configuration, including each job's prior throughput. LEAP reaches an accuracy of 77% over 30 nightly retrains, higher than the lookup table it replaced and at least as high as every alternative model we tested, including fine-tuned language models. Over six months, the share of eligible training GPU-hours that received a ranking by LEAP grew from 58% to 95%, and we estimate that it saves about 3% of training computational cost. In this paper, we identify the drivers that actually move accuracy and those that do not. We offer these as lessons for teams building performance predictors at fleet scale.
作者备注：16 pages, 8 figures, 4 tables
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-03 07:02 · 最新观测版本
Look Before You Launch: Learned Throughput Prediction for Hardware Selection in a Production Training Fleet
In mixed-vendor accelerator fleets, many training jobs can run on several hardware types, and the best choice depends on each job's throughput on each type. Routing a job needs a throughput estimate for every candidate type before the job runs. We present LEAP, a machine learning performance prediction service that predicts each training job's throughput on every candidate hardware type at submission time and ranks the candidates by predicted throughput per unit cost. It routes tens of thousands of training job attempts a day across hundreds of different model types and more than 20 hardware types in a production fleet. LEAP predicts throughput from submission-time training configuration, including each job's prior throughput. LEAP reaches an accuracy of 77% over 30 nightly retrains, higher than the lookup table it replaced and at least as high as every alternative model we tested, including fine-tuned language models. Over six months, the share of eligible training GPU-hours that received a ranking by LEAP grew from 58% to 95%, and we estimate that it saves about 3% of training computational cost. In this paper, we identify the drivers that actually move accuracy and those that do not. We offer these as lessons for teams building performance predictors at fleet scale.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗