跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.04367 · v1

Do Coding Agents Follow AGENTS.md? The Effect of Policy Wording on Instruction Compliance

首次提交 2026-11-03 13:54
版本更新 2026-11-03 13:54
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:40
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Coding agents do not always follow the policies in an Agent Context File (ACF). We inserted one policy, in four styles, into the ACFs of 86 benchmark tasks across four harness-model combinations. Conditional phrasing was followed less often than Prescriptive and Explanatory. The better of those two varied by combination.

作者备注:4 pages, 1 figure, 4 tables. (c) IEICE. This paper has been submitted to IEICE and is currently under review

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-03 13:54 · 最新观测版本

Do Coding Agents Follow AGENTS.md? The Effect of Policy Wording on Instruction Compliance

Coding agents do not always follow the policies in an Agent Context File (ACF). We inserted one policy, in four styles, into the ACFs of 86 benchmark tasks across four harness-model combinations. Conditional phrasing was followed less often than Prescriptive and Explanatory. The better of those two varied by combination.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗