跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.04475 · v1

On the Complexity of Exact Autobidding Equilibria

首次提交 2026-11-03 16:05
版本更新 2026-11-03 16:05
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:40
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Autobidding equilibria link advertisers' value multipliers or participation probabilities through aggregate budget and return-on-investment (ROI) constraints. We establish the exact computational complexity of finding these equilibria across several canonical settings: exact equilibrium computation is $\mathsf{FIXP}$-complete for second-price ROI pacing, budget- or ROI-constrained generalized second-price (GSP) sponsored shopping, and second-price throttling. Furthermore, approximating the equilibrium control vector in distance to a true equilibrium is $\mathsf{FIXP}_{a}$-complete when the target accuracy is provided as input.

作者备注:Full version with appendices

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-03 16:05 · 最新观测版本

On the Complexity of Exact Autobidding Equilibria

Autobidding equilibria link advertisers' value multipliers or participation probabilities through aggregate budget and return-on-investment (ROI) constraints. We establish the exact computational complexity of finding these equilibria across several canonical settings: exact equilibrium computation is $\mathsf{FIXP}$-complete for second-price ROI pacing, budget- or ROI-constrained generalized second-price (GSP) sponsored shopping, and second-price throttling. Furthermore, approximating the equilibrium control vector in distance to a true equilibrium is $\mathsf{FIXP}_{a}$-complete when the target accuracy is provided as input.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗