← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.04603 · v1
SCANO: Restoring Boundary-Condition Completeness in Sampled Meshes with a Sliced-Cross-Attention Neural Operator for 3D Thermal Fields
首次提交 2026-11-03 17:56
版本更新 2026-11-03 17:56
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:39
摘要
Training neural operators on million-cell meshes can exceed GPU memory limits. Models are therefore trained on subsamples and deployed on whole meshes or selected regions. However, subsampling can distort boundary information, degrading accuracy. We ask when boundary conditioning under sampling stays consistent with whole-mesh training, and how to aggregate and inject boundary data. Representing the solution as an integral of boundary data against type-dependent measures, we show that subsampling distorts this conditioning in three ways: incomplete boundary coverage or a sample-dependent global state, face weighting by count rather than area, and compression of boundary inputs into a low-dimensional vector. This analysis yields four measurable consistency conditions checkable before training. We satisfy them with two backbone-agnostic modules. Boundary Quadrature Attention (BQA) aggregates all boundary faces, typed and area-weighted, into slice tokens that every query point reads at every layer. Anchored Global State (AGS) estimates the global state from anchors independent of the sampled points. Adding both to a scalable message-passing and slice-attention backbone yields SCANO. We evaluate the approach on controlled and public benchmarks and a data-centre thermal simulation dataset (DCTS) containing million-cell meshes. On both benchmarks, BQA improves every backbone, reducing whole-mesh error up to 15-fold. On all three datasets, AGS aligns regional with whole-mesh predictions, cutting regional error at least tenfold for most backbones on the public benchmark. Together, the modules nearly halve the best original backbone's whole-mesh error on both benchmarks. SCANO predicts a room-scale field in under one second, over 100 times faster than whole-room anchor self-attention.
作者备注：88 pages (46 main text + 42 supplementary material)
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-03 17:56 · 最新观测版本
SCANO: Restoring Boundary-Condition Completeness in Sampled Meshes with a Sliced-Cross-Attention Neural Operator for 3D Thermal Fields
Training neural operators on million-cell meshes can exceed GPU memory limits. Models are therefore trained on subsamples and deployed on whole meshes or selected regions. However, subsampling can distort boundary information, degrading accuracy. We ask when boundary conditioning under sampling stays consistent with whole-mesh training, and how to aggregate and inject boundary data. Representing the solution as an integral of boundary data against type-dependent measures, we show that subsampling distorts this conditioning in three ways: incomplete boundary coverage or a sample-dependent global state, face weighting by count rather than area, and compression of boundary inputs into a low-dimensional vector. This analysis yields four measurable consistency conditions checkable before training. We satisfy them with two backbone-agnostic modules. Boundary Quadrature Attention (BQA) aggregates all boundary faces, typed and area-weighted, into slice tokens that every query point reads at every layer. Anchored Global State (AGS) estimates the global state from anchors independent of the sampled points. Adding both to a scalable message-passing and slice-attention backbone yields SCANO. We evaluate the approach on controlled and public benchmarks and a data-centre thermal simulation dataset (DCTS) containing million-cell meshes. On both benchmarks, BQA improves every backbone, reducing whole-mesh error up to 15-fold. On all three datasets, AGS aligns regional with whole-mesh predictions, cutting regional error at least tenfold for most backbones on the public benchmark. Together, the modules nearly halve the best original backbone's whole-mesh error on both benchmarks. SCANO predicts a room-scale field in under one second, over 100 times faster than whole-room anchor self-attention.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗