跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.04757 · v1

When Should an LLM Steering Edit Depend on the Input?

首次提交 2026-11-03 20:08
版本更新 2026-11-03 20:08
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:39
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

An activation steering edit should depend on the input exactly when the destination varies \emph{inside} the class a query requests, and that is measurable before any rule is fitted or applied. Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA) adds one fixed direction to every input, the difference of the class means. Conditioning it on the requested class accounts for the between-class variation in the required displacement and leaves the within-class variation untouched, which no rule that reads only the source state can express. We study the impact of increasing input-dependence in the steering edit, moving from a difference of means to a destination retrieved per query --- the mean of the $k$ stored states nearest the query, inside the requested class --- in which the two baselines are endpoints: at $k$ equal to the class size the retrieved rule \emph{is} the class-conditional difference of means. We measure input-dependent steering on six substitution corpora that vary in whether the edit changes a word or a clause, and on an external benchmark, and find that input-dependent steering outperforms fixed-direction steering when the destination varies within the class. Retrieval wins at every layer of every substitution corpus in two models, and the level of input-dependence needed governs how to apply it: word-level edits are best made in the first tenth of the network from a few neighbours, clause-level edits at any depth from the class mean. Where the class already determines the answer the class mean suffices and retrieval only matches it, though a fixed direction still fails there. Four quantities computed from the states alone identify the regime in which the edit should be applied.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-03 20:08 · 最新观测版本

When Should an LLM Steering Edit Depend on the Input?

An activation steering edit should depend on the input exactly when the destination varies \emph{inside} the class a query requests, and that is measurable before any rule is fitted or applied. Contrastive Activation Addition (CAA) adds one fixed direction to every input, the difference of the class means. Conditioning it on the requested class accounts for the between-class variation in the required displacement and leaves the within-class variation untouched, which no rule that reads only the source state can express. We study the impact of increasing input-dependence in the steering edit, moving from a difference of means to a destination retrieved per query --- the mean of the $k$ stored states nearest the query, inside the requested class --- in which the two baselines are endpoints: at $k$ equal to the class size the retrieved rule \emph{is} the class-conditional difference of means. We measure input-dependent steering on six substitution corpora that vary in whether the edit changes a word or a clause, and on an external benchmark, and find that input-dependent steering outperforms fixed-direction steering when the destination varies within the class. Retrieval wins at every layer of every substitution corpus in two models, and the level of input-dependence needed governs how to apply it: word-level edits are best made in the first tenth of the network from a few neighbours, clause-level edits at any depth from the class mean. Where the class already determines the answer the class mean suffices and retrieval only matches it, though a fixed direction still fails there. Four quantities computed from the states alone identify the regime in which the edit should be applied.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗