跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.04775 · v1

Learning to Rank Explanations for Recommendation with Language Models

首次提交 2026-11-03 20:15
版本更新 2026-11-03 20:15
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:39
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Recommender systems are ubiquitous on the Web, making understandable explanations essential for users. Although large language models (LLMs) increasingly generate natural-language justifications, evaluating their factual grounding and personalized relevance remains challenging. Statement-level ranking offers an alternative by selecting concise, review-derived explanations, enabling fine-grained and reproducible evaluation using established ranking metrics. However, existing statement ranking methods largely rely on collaborative representations, while semantic enhancements often fail to outperform simple user-history popularity baselines. Moreover, directly adapting language models for personalized statement ranking remains largely unexplored. In this work, we introduce LMStaR (Language Models for Statement Ranking), a fully text-based framework that formulates personalized explanation ranking as dense retrieval. A query encoder represents the user's interaction history and target-item metadata, while a statement encoder maps candidate explanations into a shared embedding space. Both encoders are jointly adapted through multi-positive contrastive learning to learn personalized relevance. Experiments on Amazon Beauty, Amazon Toys, and Yelp show that LMStaR achieves the highest NDCG@1 across all three domains, outperforming CLER by 1.06--8.25 points (+11.8--65.9%). It also leads top-five ranking on both Amazon datasets, although CLER remains stronger on Yelp. Task-specific adaptation improves all five evaluated backbones and transfers across domains without target-domain fine-tuning. Counterfactual analyses further reveal the importance of user-specific histories. These findings highlight the potential of task-adapted language models for personalized explanation ranking.

作者备注:12 pages, 5 figures, 7 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-03 20:15 · 最新观测版本

Learning to Rank Explanations for Recommendation with Language Models

Recommender systems are ubiquitous on the Web, making understandable explanations essential for users. Although large language models (LLMs) increasingly generate natural-language justifications, evaluating their factual grounding and personalized relevance remains challenging. Statement-level ranking offers an alternative by selecting concise, review-derived explanations, enabling fine-grained and reproducible evaluation using established ranking metrics. However, existing statement ranking methods largely rely on collaborative representations, while semantic enhancements often fail to outperform simple user-history popularity baselines. Moreover, directly adapting language models for personalized statement ranking remains largely unexplored. In this work, we introduce LMStaR (Language Models for Statement Ranking), a fully text-based framework that formulates personalized explanation ranking as dense retrieval. A query encoder represents the user's interaction history and target-item metadata, while a statement encoder maps candidate explanations into a shared embedding space. Both encoders are jointly adapted through multi-positive contrastive learning to learn personalized relevance. Experiments on Amazon Beauty, Amazon Toys, and Yelp show that LMStaR achieves the highest NDCG@1 across all three domains, outperforming CLER by 1.06--8.25 points (+11.8--65.9%). It also leads top-five ranking on both Amazon datasets, although CLER remains stronger on Yelp. Task-specific adaptation improves all five evaluated backbones and transfers across domains without target-domain fine-tuning. Counterfactual analyses further reveal the importance of user-specific histories. These findings highlight the potential of task-adapted language models for personalized explanation ranking.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗