跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.04803 · v1

Extracting System Prompt of LLM Services in Complex (Agentic) Settings: Hierarchical Optimization and Reliable Evaluation Metrics

首次提交 2026-11-03 20:37
版本更新 2026-11-03 20:37
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:39
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

System prompt is a critical intellectual property of large language model (LLM) services. To analyze its leakage, prompt extraction attacks have been extensively studied. However, we validate that existing attacks substantially degrade on recent LLM services, whose complexity has evolved in both the prompt itself and system-level constraints. Specifically, (1) system prompts become longer and more structured to contain pre-defined tool schemas, execution logic, safety guardrails, etc., and (2) only the final post-processed outputs (e.g., agent's actions) but not the raw textual response can be observed. In this paper, we address the above increased complexity by proposing Extraction with Hierarchical Optimization (ExtraHerO), which (1) decomposes the prompt extraction into a hierarchical reconstruction process with a pre-defined structural prompt template, and (2) iteratively updates the adversarial query with guidance of feedback-template differences to observe diverse outputs. In particular, we monitor the information gain of attack optimization to early stop or reset it for a good trade-off between effectiveness and efficiency. We also find that existing evaluation metrics for prompt fidelity can be misleading because they do not account for structural information. Therefore, we rely on global textual similarity and prioritize structural keywords. Moreover, we introduce a system-level metric, adversarial utility, to measure the help of prompt extraction for real-world downstream attacks. Experimental results demonstrate the consistent superiority of ExtraHerO, with average improvements of 12.5\% (fidelity), 2.3\% (functionality), and 6.0\% (adversarial utility) on chatbots, and 12.2\%, 34.3\%, and 30.5\% on agents.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-03 20:37 · 最新观测版本

Extracting System Prompt of LLM Services in Complex (Agentic) Settings: Hierarchical Optimization and Reliable Evaluation Metrics

System prompt is a critical intellectual property of large language model (LLM) services. To analyze its leakage, prompt extraction attacks have been extensively studied. However, we validate that existing attacks substantially degrade on recent LLM services, whose complexity has evolved in both the prompt itself and system-level constraints. Specifically, (1) system prompts become longer and more structured to contain pre-defined tool schemas, execution logic, safety guardrails, etc., and (2) only the final post-processed outputs (e.g., agent's actions) but not the raw textual response can be observed. In this paper, we address the above increased complexity by proposing Extraction with Hierarchical Optimization (ExtraHerO), which (1) decomposes the prompt extraction into a hierarchical reconstruction process with a pre-defined structural prompt template, and (2) iteratively updates the adversarial query with guidance of feedback-template differences to observe diverse outputs. In particular, we monitor the information gain of attack optimization to early stop or reset it for a good trade-off between effectiveness and efficiency. We also find that existing evaluation metrics for prompt fidelity can be misleading because they do not account for structural information. Therefore, we rely on global textual similarity and prioritize structural keywords. Moreover, we introduce a system-level metric, adversarial utility, to measure the help of prompt extraction for real-world downstream attacks. Experimental results demonstrate the consistent superiority of ExtraHerO, with average improvements of 12.5\% (fidelity), 2.3\% (functionality), and 6.0\% (adversarial utility) on chatbots, and 12.2\%, 34.3\%, and 30.5\% on agents.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗