跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.04826 · v1

Safe Portfolio Learning from Untrusted Predictions: Signed Trust, Abstention, and Cross-Universe Polarity Failure

首次提交 2026-11-03 20:55
版本更新 2026-11-03 20:55
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:39
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Portfolio use of machine predictions must often proceed while the predictions' economic direction, reliability, and timing remain untrusted, and while feedback from overlapping multi-period positions arrives with delay. A controller chooses among Safe, Follow, and Reverse portfolio actions, so signal orientation is learned rather than assumed. A share-adaptive master updates action probabilities from matured Safe-relative rewards, an evidence gate can abstain by transferring unsupported directional probability to Safe, a delayed collateral budget reserves worst-case loss capacity before exposure is funded, and a protected split account caps the capital adaptive decisions may touch. The architecture carries a dual certificate, tracking regret against switching action sequences under delay and one-sided intervention, together with a pathwise collateral safety bound that holds when predictions fail. On a 24-stock development universe a conservative prediction-assisted overlay stays near equal-weight performance at a fraction of the turnover. On a frozen 82-stock holdout, the pre-specified Reverse orientation fails to outperform Equal Weight; a separately labeled post-holdout diagnostic shows that permanently flipping the sign to Follow also does not recover a return edge. Under the post-holdout controller, protected wealth remains within 15.9 basis points of the Safe benchmark throughout. The contribution is safe adaptive use of untrusted predictions, not demonstrated alpha.

作者备注:39 pages including the online supplement, 6 figures. Result tables behind every reported number are attached as ancillary files

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-03 20:55 · 最新观测版本

Safe Portfolio Learning from Untrusted Predictions: Signed Trust, Abstention, and Cross-Universe Polarity Failure

Portfolio use of machine predictions must often proceed while the predictions' economic direction, reliability, and timing remain untrusted, and while feedback from overlapping multi-period positions arrives with delay. A controller chooses among Safe, Follow, and Reverse portfolio actions, so signal orientation is learned rather than assumed. A share-adaptive master updates action probabilities from matured Safe-relative rewards, an evidence gate can abstain by transferring unsupported directional probability to Safe, a delayed collateral budget reserves worst-case loss capacity before exposure is funded, and a protected split account caps the capital adaptive decisions may touch. The architecture carries a dual certificate, tracking regret against switching action sequences under delay and one-sided intervention, together with a pathwise collateral safety bound that holds when predictions fail. On a 24-stock development universe a conservative prediction-assisted overlay stays near equal-weight performance at a fraction of the turnover. On a frozen 82-stock holdout, the pre-specified Reverse orientation fails to outperform Equal Weight; a separately labeled post-holdout diagnostic shows that permanently flipping the sign to Follow also does not recover a return edge. Under the post-holdout controller, protected wealth remains within 15.9 basis points of the Safe benchmark throughout. The contribution is safe adaptive use of untrusted predictions, not demonstrated alpha.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗