跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.05130 · v1

Solving the Nonlinear Westervelt Equation in Ultrasound Propagation Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks

首次提交 2026-11-04 00:14
版本更新 2026-11-04 00:14
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:39
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Modeling the nonlinear acoustic wave propagation in biological tissues needs accuracy, especially in ultrasound imaging and therapeutic applications. The 1D Westervelt equation, \( p_{xx} - p_{tt} + γ\, p_{ttt} + η\,(p^{2})_{tt}=0, \) could be used to describe a finite-amplitude ultrasound propagation in these tissues. This equation accounts for nonlinearity, \(η\), and attenuation, \(γ\). To solve this equation, we observe that traditional solvers may struggle to do so correctly. This is due to the difficulties arising from the nonlinear nature of the equation. We solve the equation by defining three synthetic cases - linear (\(η=0.001\), \(γ=10^{-6}\)), shock-dominated (\(η=0.02\), \(γ=10^{-6}\)), and dissipation-dominated (\(η=0.01\), \(γ=5\times10^{-4}\)) - and using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to showcase the solution. A sinusoidal activation function is used to capture the oscillatory behavior of the problem. The results of our study, with PDE residual converging to at least \(10^{-6}\), boundary condition loss to \(10^{-5}\), and the PINN loss converging to \(10^{-5}\) for each case at \(30,000\) epochs, show that \(γ\) scales the rate of amplitude decay, while \(η\) governs frequency-dependent phase speeds.

作者备注:17 pages, 21 figures

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-04 00:14 · 最新观测版本

Solving the Nonlinear Westervelt Equation in Ultrasound Propagation Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks

Modeling the nonlinear acoustic wave propagation in biological tissues needs accuracy, especially in ultrasound imaging and therapeutic applications. The 1D Westervelt equation, \( p_{xx} - p_{tt} + γ\, p_{ttt} + η\,(p^{2})_{tt}=0, \) could be used to describe a finite-amplitude ultrasound propagation in these tissues. This equation accounts for nonlinearity, \(η\), and attenuation, \(γ\). To solve this equation, we observe that traditional solvers may struggle to do so correctly. This is due to the difficulties arising from the nonlinear nature of the equation. We solve the equation by defining three synthetic cases - linear (\(η=0.001\), \(γ=10^{-6}\)), shock-dominated (\(η=0.02\), \(γ=10^{-6}\)), and dissipation-dominated (\(η=0.01\), \(γ=5\times10^{-4}\)) - and using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to showcase the solution. A sinusoidal activation function is used to capture the oscillatory behavior of the problem. The results of our study, with PDE residual converging to at least \(10^{-6}\), boundary condition loss to \(10^{-5}\), and the PINN loss converging to \(10^{-5}\) for each case at \(30,000\) epochs, show that \(γ\) scales the rate of amplitude decay, while \(η\) governs frequency-dependent phase speeds.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗