← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.05130 · v1
Solving the Nonlinear Westervelt Equation in Ultrasound Propagation Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks
首次提交 2026-11-04 00:14
版本更新 2026-11-04 00:14
雷达观测 2026-11-04 23:39
摘要
Modeling the nonlinear acoustic wave propagation in biological tissues needs accuracy, especially in ultrasound imaging and therapeutic applications. The 1D Westervelt equation, \( p_{xx} - p_{tt} + γ\, p_{ttt} + η\,(p^{2})_{tt}=0, \) could be used to describe a finite-amplitude ultrasound propagation in these tissues. This equation accounts for nonlinearity, \(η\), and attenuation, \(γ\). To solve this equation, we observe that traditional solvers may struggle to do so correctly. This is due to the difficulties arising from the nonlinear nature of the equation. We solve the equation by defining three synthetic cases - linear (\(η=0.001\), \(γ=10^{-6}\)), shock-dominated (\(η=0.02\), \(γ=10^{-6}\)), and dissipation-dominated (\(η=0.01\), \(γ=5\times10^{-4}\)) - and using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to showcase the solution. A sinusoidal activation function is used to capture the oscillatory behavior of the problem. The results of our study, with PDE residual converging to at least \(10^{-6}\), boundary condition loss to \(10^{-5}\), and the PINN loss converging to \(10^{-5}\) for each case at \(30,000\) epochs, show that \(γ\) scales the rate of amplitude decay, while \(η\) governs frequency-dependent phase speeds.
作者备注:17 pages, 21 figures
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-04 00:14 · 最新观测版本
Solving the Nonlinear Westervelt Equation in Ultrasound Propagation Using Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Modeling the nonlinear acoustic wave propagation in biological tissues needs accuracy, especially in ultrasound imaging and therapeutic applications. The 1D Westervelt equation, \( p_{xx} - p_{tt} + γ\, p_{ttt} + η\,(p^{2})_{tt}=0, \) could be used to describe a finite-amplitude ultrasound propagation in these tissues. This equation accounts for nonlinearity, \(η\), and attenuation, \(γ\). To solve this equation, we observe that traditional solvers may struggle to do so correctly. This is due to the difficulties arising from the nonlinear nature of the equation. We solve the equation by defining three synthetic cases - linear (\(η=0.001\), \(γ=10^{-6}\)), shock-dominated (\(η=0.02\), \(γ=10^{-6}\)), and dissipation-dominated (\(η=0.01\), \(γ=5\times10^{-4}\)) - and using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to showcase the solution. A sinusoidal activation function is used to capture the oscillatory behavior of the problem. The results of our study, with PDE residual converging to at least \(10^{-6}\), boundary condition loss to \(10^{-5}\), and the PINN loss converging to \(10^{-5}\) for each case at \(30,000\) epochs, show that \(γ\) scales the rate of amplitude decay, while \(η\) governs frequency-dependent phase speeds.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗