跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.05437 · v1

Req-Space: A User Study of Interactive Visualisations for Requirements Review

首次提交 2026-11-03 18:29
版本更新 2026-11-03 18:29
雷达观测 2026-11-05 10:09
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Requirements review involves identifying inconsistencies and assessing change implications across distributed specifications. Motivated by needs raised in industrial project workshops, we investigate Req-Space, an interactive prototype integrating semantic exploration and traceability visualisation to support human-led review. We conducted a fixed-order, two-phase study with 20 participants, including 11 with at least three years of software or IT experience. Participants reviewed a fictional 40-requirement software specification and a guest-checkout change request, first using source documents and then revisiting the same tasks with Req-Space. During the supported review, 17 participants recorded at least one additional source-supported item or pair. Of 69 assessable additional units, 58 (84.1%) were judged supported by the source materials. Seven decision rationales were judged stronger in Phase 2, including five without a change in the decision category. Participants generally found the visualisations helpful, although workload responses were mixed and some misinterpreted visual relationships. The findings suggest that visual support can facilitate requirements exploration and decision justification, provided relationship meanings and source context remain clear. The fixed study sequence prevents attributing the observed changes specifically to Req-Space.

作者备注:This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-03 18:29 · 最新观测版本

Req-Space: A User Study of Interactive Visualisations for Requirements Review

Requirements review involves identifying inconsistencies and assessing change implications across distributed specifications. Motivated by needs raised in industrial project workshops, we investigate Req-Space, an interactive prototype integrating semantic exploration and traceability visualisation to support human-led review. We conducted a fixed-order, two-phase study with 20 participants, including 11 with at least three years of software or IT experience. Participants reviewed a fictional 40-requirement software specification and a guest-checkout change request, first using source documents and then revisiting the same tasks with Req-Space. During the supported review, 17 participants recorded at least one additional source-supported item or pair. Of 69 assessable additional units, 58 (84.1%) were judged supported by the source materials. Seven decision rationales were judged stronger in Phase 2, including five without a change in the decision category. Participants generally found the visualisations helpful, although workload responses were mixed and some misinterpreted visual relationships. The findings suggest that visual support can facilitate requirements exploration and decision justification, provided relationship meanings and source context remain clear. The fixed study sequence prevents attributing the observed changes specifically to Req-Space.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗