跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.05511 · v1

Improved lower bounds on the approximability of Multiway Cut using Sherali-Adams relaxations

首次提交 2026-11-04 03:10
版本更新 2026-11-04 03:10
雷达观测 2026-11-05 10:08
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

The Multiway Cut problem is among the most well-studied problems in the area of combinatorial approximation algorithms. The currently best approximation ratio for the problem is 1.2787, obtained recently by the authors (2026). The best lower bound on the approximation ratio that can be achieved for the problem in polynomial time, under the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), is 1.20016, obtained by Bérczi, Chandrasekaran, Király, and Madan (2020), building on and slightly improving a bound of $\frac65=1.2$, obtained by Angelidakis, Makarychev, and Manurangsi (2017) by introducing the important framework of non-opposite multiway cuts. We obtain a substantially improved lower bound of 1.22232 on the approximation ratio of the Multiway Cut problem. Manokaran, Naor, Raghavendra, and Schwartz (2008) showed that under UGC, the approximation ratio of Multiway Cut is equal to the integrality ratio of a simple LP relaxation, known as the CKR relaxation, introduced by Călinescu, Karloff, and Rabani (2000). Thus, stronger LP relaxations are not required for obtaining an optimal approximation algorithm for the problem. We show, however, that relying on the framework of Angelidakis, Makarychev, and Manurangsi (2017), stronger LP relaxations from the Sherali-Adams hierarchy for non-opposite multiway cuts can be used to obtain improved integrality ratios for the CKR relaxation, and hence improved lower bounds on the approximation ratio of the Multiway Cut problem. One of the novel features of our analysis is considering a continuous limit of discrete LPs defined on a simplex. Our proof of the new 1.22232 bound is completely analytic. We also present strong numerical evidence that suggests that our techniques can be used to improve the lower bound to at least 1.23003.

作者备注:66 pages

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-04 03:10 · 最新观测版本

Improved lower bounds on the approximability of Multiway Cut using Sherali-Adams relaxations

The Multiway Cut problem is among the most well-studied problems in the area of combinatorial approximation algorithms. The currently best approximation ratio for the problem is 1.2787, obtained recently by the authors (2026). The best lower bound on the approximation ratio that can be achieved for the problem in polynomial time, under the Unique Games Conjecture (UGC), is 1.20016, obtained by Bérczi, Chandrasekaran, Király, and Madan (2020), building on and slightly improving a bound of $\frac65=1.2$, obtained by Angelidakis, Makarychev, and Manurangsi (2017) by introducing the important framework of non-opposite multiway cuts. We obtain a substantially improved lower bound of 1.22232 on the approximation ratio of the Multiway Cut problem. Manokaran, Naor, Raghavendra, and Schwartz (2008) showed that under UGC, the approximation ratio of Multiway Cut is equal to the integrality ratio of a simple LP relaxation, known as the CKR relaxation, introduced by Călinescu, Karloff, and Rabani (2000). Thus, stronger LP relaxations are not required for obtaining an optimal approximation algorithm for the problem. We show, however, that relying on the framework of Angelidakis, Makarychev, and Manurangsi (2017), stronger LP relaxations from the Sherali-Adams hierarchy for non-opposite multiway cuts can be used to obtain improved integrality ratios for the CKR relaxation, and hence improved lower bounds on the approximation ratio of the Multiway Cut problem. One of the novel features of our analysis is considering a continuous limit of discrete LPs defined on a simplex. Our proof of the new 1.22232 bound is completely analytic. We also present strong numerical evidence that suggests that our techniques can be used to improve the lower bound to at least 1.23003.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗