跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.05799 · v1

Item Representations Matter: Bridging Hard Semantic IDs and Soft Prototype Mixtures for Generative Retrieval

首次提交 2026-11-04 09:14
版本更新 2026-11-04 09:14
雷达观测 2026-11-05 10:08
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Modern recommender systems rely on generative retrieval techniques to predict the next item either as discrete codes or as a continuous vector. On the one hand, Semantic IDs (SIDs) give discrete models shared parameters and pretrained semantic structure, but discretizing items into hard codes discards some information from the original content embeddings. On the other hand, continuous models avoid quantization, yet typically use flat item lookup tables with no explicit parameter tying across items. We ask whether a continuous recommender can introduce shared structure without making it a discrete bottleneck. We propose CAP-Mix, a flow recommender that represents each item as a soft mixture of shared prototypes plus an item-specific vector. The assignments, prototypes, and item vectors are trained jointly, and the soft representation is retained at inference. Pretrained information is optional: SID responsibilities can serve as a prior over assignments, while a full content embedding can initialize the item-specific vector without changing the initial flat table. In matched comparisons on three datasets, CAP-Mix improves over a flat table on the two sparse Amazon datasets and yields a small gain on Steam when trained without pretrained information. Given only an offline SID, it outperforms a hard table built from the same tokenizer by 4.45-14.90% in HR@5. Given the full content embedding, it matches or improves a strong flat table while hard assignments regress on the sparse Amazon datasets. Overall, averaged across six benchmarks, CAP-Mix improves HR@5 and NDCG@5 by 6.9% and 13.6% relative to the best evaluated baseline for each dataset and metric, while delivering 1.4-161x the inference throughput of the discrete baselines in our experiments.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-04 09:14 · 最新观测版本

Item Representations Matter: Bridging Hard Semantic IDs and Soft Prototype Mixtures for Generative Retrieval

Modern recommender systems rely on generative retrieval techniques to predict the next item either as discrete codes or as a continuous vector. On the one hand, Semantic IDs (SIDs) give discrete models shared parameters and pretrained semantic structure, but discretizing items into hard codes discards some information from the original content embeddings. On the other hand, continuous models avoid quantization, yet typically use flat item lookup tables with no explicit parameter tying across items. We ask whether a continuous recommender can introduce shared structure without making it a discrete bottleneck. We propose CAP-Mix, a flow recommender that represents each item as a soft mixture of shared prototypes plus an item-specific vector. The assignments, prototypes, and item vectors are trained jointly, and the soft representation is retained at inference. Pretrained information is optional: SID responsibilities can serve as a prior over assignments, while a full content embedding can initialize the item-specific vector without changing the initial flat table. In matched comparisons on three datasets, CAP-Mix improves over a flat table on the two sparse Amazon datasets and yields a small gain on Steam when trained without pretrained information. Given only an offline SID, it outperforms a hard table built from the same tokenizer by 4.45-14.90% in HR@5. Given the full content embedding, it matches or improves a strong flat table while hard assignments regress on the sparse Amazon datasets. Overall, averaged across six benchmarks, CAP-Mix improves HR@5 and NDCG@5 by 6.9% and 13.6% relative to the best evaluated baseline for each dataset and metric, while delivering 1.4-161x the inference throughput of the discrete baselines in our experiments.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗