跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.05956 · v1

The Complexity of Unpredictability

首次提交 2026-11-04 12:50
版本更新 2026-11-04 12:50
雷达观测 2026-11-05 10:08
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We initiate the study of middle-bit predictors: functions that take as input a string with one missing bit and try to predict that bit. These are closely related to next-bit predictors, a classical object in pseudorandomness. We study the deterministic complexity of computing an unpredictable distribution (UNPRED). Given a list of middle-bit predictors in circuit form and a parameter $ε>0$, output a multiset of strings such that each predictor succeeds with probability less than $1/2+ε$ on a uniformly sampled string from the multiset. We write $\mathsf{UNPRED}^{\mathsf{TC}^1}$ for the restriction to $\mathsf{TC}^1$ predictors. We show that UNPRED offers a unified route towards resolving several major open problems in catalytic computation, the biggest of which is whether deterministic polynomial time (P and FP) can simulate catalytic logspace (CL and SearchCL). It is believed that $\mathsf{SearchCL}\subseteq\mathsf{FP}$. We prove $$\mathsf{UNPRED}\in\mathsf{FP}\implies\mathsf{SearchCL}\subseteq\mathsf{FP}\implies\mathsf{UNPRED}^{\mathsf{TC}^1}\in\mathsf{FP}.$$ Thus, the questions of whether UNPRED is in FP and whether SearchCL is contained in FP are almost equivalent, up to the restriction to $\mathsf{TC}^1$ circuits. We also show that any deterministic polynomial-time algorithm for $\mathsf{UNPRED}^{\mathsf{TC}^1}$ must exploit properties of $\mathsf{TC}^1$ circuits, either in the algorithm itself or in its analysis. To our knowledge, this would also be the first algorithm to use the structure of $\mathsf{TC}^1$ circuits in this way to solve a natural problem, thus advancing our understanding of Boolean circuits. Together, our results provide strong evidence that middle-bit predictors could be the key to unlocking several major open problems in catalytic computation, pseudorandomness, and Boolean circuit complexity.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-04 12:50 · 最新观测版本

The Complexity of Unpredictability

We initiate the study of middle-bit predictors: functions that take as input a string with one missing bit and try to predict that bit. These are closely related to next-bit predictors, a classical object in pseudorandomness. We study the deterministic complexity of computing an unpredictable distribution (UNPRED). Given a list of middle-bit predictors in circuit form and a parameter $ε>0$, output a multiset of strings such that each predictor succeeds with probability less than $1/2+ε$ on a uniformly sampled string from the multiset. We write $\mathsf{UNPRED}^{\mathsf{TC}^1}$ for the restriction to $\mathsf{TC}^1$ predictors. We show that UNPRED offers a unified route towards resolving several major open problems in catalytic computation, the biggest of which is whether deterministic polynomial time (P and FP) can simulate catalytic logspace (CL and SearchCL). It is believed that $\mathsf{SearchCL}\subseteq\mathsf{FP}$. We prove $$\mathsf{UNPRED}\in\mathsf{FP}\implies\mathsf{SearchCL}\subseteq\mathsf{FP}\implies\mathsf{UNPRED}^{\mathsf{TC}^1}\in\mathsf{FP}.$$ Thus, the questions of whether UNPRED is in FP and whether SearchCL is contained in FP are almost equivalent, up to the restriction to $\mathsf{TC}^1$ circuits. We also show that any deterministic polynomial-time algorithm for $\mathsf{UNPRED}^{\mathsf{TC}^1}$ must exploit properties of $\mathsf{TC}^1$ circuits, either in the algorithm itself or in its analysis. To our knowledge, this would also be the first algorithm to use the structure of $\mathsf{TC}^1$ circuits in this way to solve a natural problem, thus advancing our understanding of Boolean circuits. Together, our results provide strong evidence that middle-bit predictors could be the key to unlocking several major open problems in catalytic computation, pseudorandomness, and Boolean circuit complexity.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗