跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.06024 · v1

Optimal LCA and Sublinear Estimation for Bipartite Matching in $Δ^{O(1/\varepsilon)}$ Queries

首次提交 2026-11-04 14:28
版本更新 2026-11-04 14:28
雷达观测 2026-11-05 11:10
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

A local computation algorithm (LCA) for matching answers ``who is the mate of $v$?'' by inspecting only a small part of the graph, with all answers consistent with one matching. For $n$-vertex graphs of maximum degree $Δ\ge2$, Levi et al. [Algorithmica'17] give a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximate matching LCA using $(Δ/\varepsilon)^{O(1/\varepsilon^2)} \operatorname{polylog}(n)$ queries per invocation, while Yoshida et al. [SIAM J. Comput.'12] estimate the maximum matching size within additive error $\varepsilon n$ using $Δ^{O(1/\varepsilon^2)}$ queries. Behnezhad, Roghani, and Rubinstein [FOCS'23] proved a $Δ^{Ω(1/\varepsilon)}$ lower bound for both tasks, even on bipartite graphs and even when the LCA's matching guarantee is relaxed to additive $\varepsilon n$ error. This leaves a gap between linear and quadratic dependence on $1/\varepsilon$ in the exponent. We close this gap on bipartite graphs. We give an LCA that answers each mate query with $Δ^{O(1/\varepsilon)}$ queries for a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximate matching, and an estimator for the maximum matching size within $\varepsilon n$ using $Δ^{O(1/\varepsilon)}$ queries. On general graphs, the same algorithm gives a half-integral fractional matching and estimates the maximum fractional matching size. Our approach runs $O(\varepsilon^{-1}\logΔ)$ rounds of a deterministic local optimization method in which vertices propose to neighbors and update prices according to incoming loads. We design its updates to admit exact recursive sampling with constant expected branching, obtaining the improved randomized bound without exploring full dependency neighborhoods. To our knowledge, this is the first LCA construction based on exact recursive sampling of the iterates of a deterministic continuous optimization method. We expect this approach to have applications beyond matching.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-04 14:28 · 最新观测版本

Optimal LCA and Sublinear Estimation for Bipartite Matching in $Δ^{O(1/\varepsilon)}$ Queries

A local computation algorithm (LCA) for matching answers ``who is the mate of $v$?'' by inspecting only a small part of the graph, with all answers consistent with one matching. For $n$-vertex graphs of maximum degree $Δ\ge2$, Levi et al. [Algorithmica'17] give a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximate matching LCA using $(Δ/\varepsilon)^{O(1/\varepsilon^2)} \operatorname{polylog}(n)$ queries per invocation, while Yoshida et al. [SIAM J. Comput.'12] estimate the maximum matching size within additive error $\varepsilon n$ using $Δ^{O(1/\varepsilon^2)}$ queries. Behnezhad, Roghani, and Rubinstein [FOCS'23] proved a $Δ^{Ω(1/\varepsilon)}$ lower bound for both tasks, even on bipartite graphs and even when the LCA's matching guarantee is relaxed to additive $\varepsilon n$ error. This leaves a gap between linear and quadratic dependence on $1/\varepsilon$ in the exponent. We close this gap on bipartite graphs. We give an LCA that answers each mate query with $Δ^{O(1/\varepsilon)}$ queries for a $(1-\varepsilon)$-approximate matching, and an estimator for the maximum matching size within $\varepsilon n$ using $Δ^{O(1/\varepsilon)}$ queries. On general graphs, the same algorithm gives a half-integral fractional matching and estimates the maximum fractional matching size. Our approach runs $O(\varepsilon^{-1}\logΔ)$ rounds of a deterministic local optimization method in which vertices propose to neighbors and update prices according to incoming loads. We design its updates to admit exact recursive sampling with constant expected branching, obtaining the improved randomized bound without exploring full dependency neighborhoods. To our knowledge, this is the first LCA construction based on exact recursive sampling of the iterates of a deterministic continuous optimization method. We expect this approach to have applications beyond matching.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗