跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.06035 · v1

TRACK: Multiple Instance Learning for Anti-Money Laundering in Transaction Networks

首次提交 2026-11-04 14:39
版本更新 2026-11-04 14:39
雷达观测 2026-11-05 11:10
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Anti-money laundering (AML) investigations are organized around accounts, while the suspicious evidence for an account may reside in only a few of its transactions. Yet many account-level detectors summarize transactions before learning, and message-passing models may aggregate once more over neighboring accounts. We name this discrepancy the aggregation mismatch and study it under an account-window benchmark label defined by the presence of at least one flagged transaction. We recast account-level AML detection as multiple instance learning, in which an account-window is a bag and its transactions are instances. We propose TRACK, which encodes every transaction with a shared encoder and selectively pools the encodings into an account decision. To emulate coarse supervision, we withhold the transaction labels of five AML datasets from TRACK throughout training. Under a time-ordered protocol, TRACK achieves the highest average precision among the tabular and graph baselines trained from account labels on every dataset. Despite using only account-window supervision, it remains competitive with edge classifiers trained directly from transaction labels. Its instance scores also rank flagged transactions well above chance and approach or exceed directly supervised ranking performance across datasets.

作者备注:11 pages, 3 figures. Accepted at the 20th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM 2027)

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-04 14:39 · 最新观测版本

TRACK: Multiple Instance Learning for Anti-Money Laundering in Transaction Networks

Anti-money laundering (AML) investigations are organized around accounts, while the suspicious evidence for an account may reside in only a few of its transactions. Yet many account-level detectors summarize transactions before learning, and message-passing models may aggregate once more over neighboring accounts. We name this discrepancy the aggregation mismatch and study it under an account-window benchmark label defined by the presence of at least one flagged transaction. We recast account-level AML detection as multiple instance learning, in which an account-window is a bag and its transactions are instances. We propose TRACK, which encodes every transaction with a shared encoder and selectively pools the encodings into an account decision. To emulate coarse supervision, we withhold the transaction labels of five AML datasets from TRACK throughout training. Under a time-ordered protocol, TRACK achieves the highest average precision among the tabular and graph baselines trained from account labels on every dataset. Despite using only account-window supervision, it remains competitive with edge classifiers trained directly from transaction labels. Its instance scores also rank flagged transactions well above chance and approach or exceed directly supervised ranking performance across datasets.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗