跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.06229 · v1

Bug2Scenario: Root-Cause-Preserving Test Scenario Amplification for Autonomous Driving Software

首次提交 2026-11-04 17:37
版本更新 2026-11-04 17:37
雷达观测 2026-11-05 11:10
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Simulation-based fuzzing exposes autonomous driving system (ADS) failures by repeatedly mutating and executing scenarios, but converting one failure into reusable regression scenarios remains difficult. Such variants test whether the mechanism persists after software changes, for example by varying weather or actor placement while retaining a collision's actor-route conflict. We present Bug2Scenario, a root-cause-guided post-fuzzing framework. From scenario data, traces, and oracle evidence, it extracts a root-cause pattern. An LLM proposes semantic variations over actors, missions, routes, and weather. Deterministic rules construct DriveFuzz-compatible scenarios. Execution evidence and manual review assess preservation. Separating these responsibilities prevents fluency, syntax, or recurring labels from masquerading as causal evidence. Under matched seeds, six LLM backbones, candidate budget, and execution pipeline, Bug2Scenario improves strict preservation by 6.7 percentage points (p=0.104; not significant) and boundary-inclusive preservation by 10.6 points (p=0.011). Feedback helps some initially unsuccessful seeds yield a strictly preserved candidate. Seed-level stopping then avoids further API calls and simulator runs. Remaining failures reflect actor-placement constraints, simulator instability, and incomplete or conflicting causal evidence. Bug2Scenario thus produces reliable ADS regression assets. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/YgcCoder/Bug2Sce.

作者备注:11 pages, 3 figures, and 2 tables. Accepted at APSEC 2026. Yuchen Cao and Zhenyu Mao contributed equally. Code and artifacts: https://github.com/YgcCoder/Bug2Sce

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-04 17:37 · 最新观测版本

Bug2Scenario: Root-Cause-Preserving Test Scenario Amplification for Autonomous Driving Software

Simulation-based fuzzing exposes autonomous driving system (ADS) failures by repeatedly mutating and executing scenarios, but converting one failure into reusable regression scenarios remains difficult. Such variants test whether the mechanism persists after software changes, for example by varying weather or actor placement while retaining a collision's actor-route conflict. We present Bug2Scenario, a root-cause-guided post-fuzzing framework. From scenario data, traces, and oracle evidence, it extracts a root-cause pattern. An LLM proposes semantic variations over actors, missions, routes, and weather. Deterministic rules construct DriveFuzz-compatible scenarios. Execution evidence and manual review assess preservation. Separating these responsibilities prevents fluency, syntax, or recurring labels from masquerading as causal evidence. Under matched seeds, six LLM backbones, candidate budget, and execution pipeline, Bug2Scenario improves strict preservation by 6.7 percentage points (p=0.104; not significant) and boundary-inclusive preservation by 10.6 points (p=0.011). Feedback helps some initially unsuccessful seeds yield a strictly preserved candidate. Seed-level stopping then avoids further API calls and simulator runs. Remaining failures reflect actor-placement constraints, simulator instability, and incomplete or conflicting causal evidence. Bug2Scenario thus produces reliable ADS regression assets. Our implementation is available at https://github.com/YgcCoder/Bug2Sce.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗