跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.06953 · v1

SteelAgent: LLM-Orchestrated, Physics-Informed Steel Property Prediction with Audited Generalization and Calibrated Uncertainty

首次提交 2026-11-04 04:08
版本更新 2026-11-04 04:08
雷达观测 2026-11-06 10:05
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Steel property models can perform well on random test splits even when they extrapolate poorly to unfamiliar alloys. SteelAgent couples metallurgical descriptors and machine-learning models with a language-model interface for property prediction, uncertainty reporting and inverse design. We examine how the choice of held-out unit changes the conclusions drawn from SteelBench tensile-strength evaluations. For gradient boosting, pooled out-of-fold $R^2$ fell from 0.859 on a random split to 0.113 when steel families were held out. Empirical coverage of nominal 90% prediction intervals ranged from 91.0% under random splitting to 37.6% on held-out sources. The effect of physics-derived features depended on the evaluation. They increased gradient-boosting $R^2$ by 0.2534 in a 17-family holdout analysis and decreased it by 0.358 in a separate four-grade laboratory analysis. We report group-level errors and a synthetic regression experiment illustrating how calibration can deteriorate on held-out groups. These results motivate reporting the evaluation population alongside a property estimate or compliance score.

作者备注:10 pages, 3 tables. A shorter version of this work was published in the Proceedings of the Thirty-Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-26), Demonstrations Track, pp. 8547-8550 (2026), doi:10.24963/ijcai.2026/1000. Includes code for the synthetic experiment

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-04 04:08 · 最新观测版本

SteelAgent: LLM-Orchestrated, Physics-Informed Steel Property Prediction with Audited Generalization and Calibrated Uncertainty

Steel property models can perform well on random test splits even when they extrapolate poorly to unfamiliar alloys. SteelAgent couples metallurgical descriptors and machine-learning models with a language-model interface for property prediction, uncertainty reporting and inverse design. We examine how the choice of held-out unit changes the conclusions drawn from SteelBench tensile-strength evaluations. For gradient boosting, pooled out-of-fold $R^2$ fell from 0.859 on a random split to 0.113 when steel families were held out. Empirical coverage of nominal 90% prediction intervals ranged from 91.0% under random splitting to 37.6% on held-out sources. The effect of physics-derived features depended on the evaluation. They increased gradient-boosting $R^2$ by 0.2534 in a 17-family holdout analysis and decreased it by 0.358 in a separate four-grade laboratory analysis. We report group-level errors and a synthetic regression experiment illustrating how calibration can deteriorate on held-out groups. These results motivate reporting the evaluation population alongside a property estimate or compliance score.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗