跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.07100 · v1

Stacking Stars: Minimum-Area Packing with and without Rotation

首次提交 2026-11-05 04:11
版本更新 2026-11-05 04:11
雷达观测 2026-11-06 10:04
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study the problem of packing a given set of polygons into a minimum-area convex container, that is, placing them without overlap so as to minimize the area of their convex hull. Every previously known polynomial-time algorithm with a nontrivial approximation guarantee for packing polygons with arbitrary edge orientations required the polygons to be convex. In fact, an algorithm was not even known when every input polygon was a quadrilateral. We obtain such algorithms for the entire class of star-shaped polygons with unrestricted combinatorial complexity. The stars may be just translated or also rotated. In either case, we give an $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithm, where $n$ is the number of stars. Likewise, we get $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithms for bin and strip packing, assuming that the diameter of the stars is at most some (small) constant. Previous approximation algorithms for polygon packing focused on convex objects, and the analysis always relied on a density argument, i.e., if the area of the packed objects is at least a fraction $ρ$ of the area of the container, then we have a $(1/ρ)$-approximation. However, star-shaped polygons may need an arbitrarily large area to be packed, even when the total area of the stars approaches $0$ and each star has bounded diameter. This phenomenon prevents the use of density arguments. We instead establish a strong structural property about any packing: Even though the stars can fit together in complicated ways, we can reorganize them into simple stacks, replace these stacks by rectangles, and consider a packing of these rectangles. The rearrangement costs only a factor of $O(\log n)$, which stems from the number of size groups. We complement our algorithms by showing that both the translational and the rotational versions are APX-hard, even for constant complexity stars.

作者备注:52 pages, 35 figures

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-05 04:11 · 最新观测版本

Stacking Stars: Minimum-Area Packing with and without Rotation

We study the problem of packing a given set of polygons into a minimum-area convex container, that is, placing them without overlap so as to minimize the area of their convex hull. Every previously known polynomial-time algorithm with a nontrivial approximation guarantee for packing polygons with arbitrary edge orientations required the polygons to be convex. In fact, an algorithm was not even known when every input polygon was a quadrilateral. We obtain such algorithms for the entire class of star-shaped polygons with unrestricted combinatorial complexity. The stars may be just translated or also rotated. In either case, we give an $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithm, where $n$ is the number of stars. Likewise, we get $O(\log n)$-approximation algorithms for bin and strip packing, assuming that the diameter of the stars is at most some (small) constant. Previous approximation algorithms for polygon packing focused on convex objects, and the analysis always relied on a density argument, i.e., if the area of the packed objects is at least a fraction $ρ$ of the area of the container, then we have a $(1/ρ)$-approximation. However, star-shaped polygons may need an arbitrarily large area to be packed, even when the total area of the stars approaches $0$ and each star has bounded diameter. This phenomenon prevents the use of density arguments. We instead establish a strong structural property about any packing: Even though the stars can fit together in complicated ways, we can reorganize them into simple stacks, replace these stacks by rectangles, and consider a packing of these rectangles. The rearrangement costs only a factor of $O(\log n)$, which stems from the number of size groups. We complement our algorithms by showing that both the translational and the rotational versions are APX-hard, even for constant complexity stars.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗