跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.07170 · v1

Global Surveillance Under the Lens: Reconstructing Passive Dolev-Yao Intruders

首次提交 2026-11-05 05:53
版本更新 2026-11-05 05:53
雷达观测 2026-11-06 10:04
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Global surveillance systems record large volumes of network traffic for retrospective analysis, but packet captures alone reveal little about protocol-level semantics. This paper presents an automated, specification-guided methodology for reconstructing passive Dolev-Yao intruder executions from captured network traffic and validating the reconstructed executions against a formal protocol specification. The framework takes a PCAP capture, an AnBx specification, and the associated deployment metadata; it extracts Java-serialised objects from TCP streams, reconstructs protocol sessions and channel-to-step assignments, and generates a passive intruder that evaluates the Dolev-Yao derived checks produced by the AnBx compiler. Three reconstruction challenges are addressed: multiple serialised objects and object references within a TCP stream, ambiguity in mapping interleaved connections to concurrent protocol sessions, and semantic validation of candidate reconstructions. We evaluate the methodology on 121 protocols from the AnBx test suite. For single-session captures, the standard JDK cryptographic provider recovers 97.8% of expected objects and achieves 94.2% successful reconstruction, where success requires complete object recovery and a clean passive-intruder execution. For the 112 parallel-capable protocols, the toolchain achieves 89.3% successful reconstruction for both two and three concurrent sessions, while recovering approximately 97.2% of expected objects. Experiments with mismatched protocol-role mappings and deliberately mutated traces show that the generated Dolev-Yao checks respond to semantic inconsistencies. By making the reconstruction step explicit, the solution produces protocol-level observations on which assessments of protocol resilience and the design of defensive countermeasures can be built.

作者备注:50 pages, 7 figures

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-05 05:53 · 最新观测版本

Global Surveillance Under the Lens: Reconstructing Passive Dolev-Yao Intruders

Global surveillance systems record large volumes of network traffic for retrospective analysis, but packet captures alone reveal little about protocol-level semantics. This paper presents an automated, specification-guided methodology for reconstructing passive Dolev-Yao intruder executions from captured network traffic and validating the reconstructed executions against a formal protocol specification. The framework takes a PCAP capture, an AnBx specification, and the associated deployment metadata; it extracts Java-serialised objects from TCP streams, reconstructs protocol sessions and channel-to-step assignments, and generates a passive intruder that evaluates the Dolev-Yao derived checks produced by the AnBx compiler. Three reconstruction challenges are addressed: multiple serialised objects and object references within a TCP stream, ambiguity in mapping interleaved connections to concurrent protocol sessions, and semantic validation of candidate reconstructions. We evaluate the methodology on 121 protocols from the AnBx test suite. For single-session captures, the standard JDK cryptographic provider recovers 97.8% of expected objects and achieves 94.2% successful reconstruction, where success requires complete object recovery and a clean passive-intruder execution. For the 112 parallel-capable protocols, the toolchain achieves 89.3% successful reconstruction for both two and three concurrent sessions, while recovering approximately 97.2% of expected objects. Experiments with mismatched protocol-role mappings and deliberately mutated traces show that the generated Dolev-Yao checks respond to semantic inconsistencies. By making the reconstruction step explicit, the solution produces protocol-level observations on which assessments of protocol resilience and the design of defensive countermeasures can be built.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗