← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.07192 · v1
Backbone-Informed Adaptation after EEG Pretraining: A Capacity-Controlled Study
首次提交 2026-11-05 06:34
版本更新 2026-11-05 06:34
雷达观测 2026-11-06 10:04
摘要
Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models learn representations that combine information across channels and time. This structure motivates adapters that model the same relationships during downstream learning. However, it is not clear whether such a design outperforms other candidate adapters. Moreover, in order to arrive at a fair comparison between candidate adapters, we also need to consider their trainable parameters. Here, we ask whether a backbone-informed (native) adapter makes better use of a given capacity by comparing it against a token-wise multilayer perceptron control that transforms each feature vector independently. We approximately match their trainable parameter counts and keep the pretrained encoder fixed. Across two EEG foundation models and tasks covering emotion recognition, sleep staging, and EEG event classification, the native adapter shows no consistent advantage. For one backbone, differences between the designs are small relative to variation across runs. For the other, the token-wise control performs better on emotion recognition and EEG event classification. On sleep staging, the native adapter's advantage over the token-wise control is reduced when we also train the component that processes sequences of EEG segments. The relative performance of the two adapters depends on the backbone, task, and downstream training protocol. These findings motivate evaluating backbone-informed adapters against capacity-matched alternatives.
作者备注：25 pages, 6 figures. Code available at https://github.com/0oJimmyo0/EEGxPlore-TMLR
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-05 06:34 · 最新观测版本
Backbone-Informed Adaptation after EEG Pretraining: A Capacity-Controlled Study
Electroencephalography (EEG) foundation models learn representations that combine information across channels and time. This structure motivates adapters that model the same relationships during downstream learning. However, it is not clear whether such a design outperforms other candidate adapters. Moreover, in order to arrive at a fair comparison between candidate adapters, we also need to consider their trainable parameters. Here, we ask whether a backbone-informed (native) adapter makes better use of a given capacity by comparing it against a token-wise multilayer perceptron control that transforms each feature vector independently. We approximately match their trainable parameter counts and keep the pretrained encoder fixed. Across two EEG foundation models and tasks covering emotion recognition, sleep staging, and EEG event classification, the native adapter shows no consistent advantage. For one backbone, differences between the designs are small relative to variation across runs. For the other, the token-wise control performs better on emotion recognition and EEG event classification. On sleep staging, the native adapter's advantage over the token-wise control is reduced when we also train the component that processes sequences of EEG segments. The relative performance of the two adapters depends on the backbone, task, and downstream training protocol. These findings motivate evaluating backbone-informed adapters against capacity-matched alternatives.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗