跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.07506 · v1

Memory Fit: Architectural Support for Page Placement by Learning Models of Good Behavior

首次提交 2026-11-05 14:10
版本更新 2026-11-05 14:10
雷达观测 2026-11-06 12:09
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Server main memory is increasingly heterogeneous, incorporating technologies such as zswap, CXL memory expanders, and emerging phase-change memories (PCM). To decide where to place pages, operating systems have to choose between efficient but coarse-grained access bits, out-of-band profiling, or costly runtime instrumentation. This paper proposes memory fit, a hardware abstraction that provides precise and accurate page placement information to an operating system. Memory fit measures how well a page "fits" each type of memory in the system. Memory fit separates the mechanism of measuring affinity between pages and memories from the OS policy of choosing which pages to move when. The paper describes soft trace matching (STM), a computationally and space efficient algorithm to compute memory fit. The key technical insight behind STM is that it can estimate memory fit by comparing accesses to a page with a learned model of "good" traces for a memory. We have implemented memory fit and STM in a BOOMv3 RISC-V processor running Linux 6.6. On extended GUPS, memory fit placements recover 2.2-3.8 times as much of the performance gap to optimal placement as Linux TPP. For Redis with equal DRAM and PCM capacities, placements selected by memory fit recover 80% of the performance gap, versus 19% for TPP, in a placement replay. Memory fit requires only 64 bits of state per 4 KiB page and can be updated on every main-memory access with only a 1.2% overhead of OS kernel notification processing.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-05 14:10 · 最新观测版本

Memory Fit: Architectural Support for Page Placement by Learning Models of Good Behavior

Server main memory is increasingly heterogeneous, incorporating technologies such as zswap, CXL memory expanders, and emerging phase-change memories (PCM). To decide where to place pages, operating systems have to choose between efficient but coarse-grained access bits, out-of-band profiling, or costly runtime instrumentation. This paper proposes memory fit, a hardware abstraction that provides precise and accurate page placement information to an operating system. Memory fit measures how well a page "fits" each type of memory in the system. Memory fit separates the mechanism of measuring affinity between pages and memories from the OS policy of choosing which pages to move when. The paper describes soft trace matching (STM), a computationally and space efficient algorithm to compute memory fit. The key technical insight behind STM is that it can estimate memory fit by comparing accesses to a page with a learned model of "good" traces for a memory. We have implemented memory fit and STM in a BOOMv3 RISC-V processor running Linux 6.6. On extended GUPS, memory fit placements recover 2.2-3.8 times as much of the performance gap to optimal placement as Linux TPP. For Redis with equal DRAM and PCM capacities, placements selected by memory fit recover 80% of the performance gap, versus 19% for TPP, in a placement replay. Memory fit requires only 64 bits of state per 4 KiB page and can be updated on every main-memory access with only a 1.2% overhead of OS kernel notification processing.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗