跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.07579 · v1

Per-Query Recall Guarantees for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search in Dynamic Vector Databases

首次提交 2026-11-05 15:30
版本更新 2026-11-05 15:30
雷达观测 2026-11-06 11:06
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Vector search runs as an operator in database systems, where a missed neighbor can make a filter, join, or aggregate wrong, yet approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) indexes are tuned only for an average recall target. In our measurements, indexes tuned to an average recall of 0.99 left 5-19% of in-distribution queries and, tuned without a query log, up to 99.6% of real out-of-distribution queries below this target, and the misses grew under updates. We present PQR-Search, a k-ANN search method that guarantees $\Pr[\mathrm{Recall}(q)<τ]\leδ$ for every query. The probability is only over a random orthogonal transformation inside the index, so no distributional assumption is needed, only that queries and updates do not depend on it; the guarantee holds after insertions and deletions without retuning. PQR-Search stores 1-bit codes of rotated residuals with respect to IVF centroids and prunes with exact quantiles of their error distribution. A formula predicting the fraction of vectors that pass the code test, with no data-fitted constants, chooses index parameters and maintenance operations without affecting the guarantee. On 20 datasets of up to 100 million vectors, failure rates stayed at most $δ$ in every audit, including all 33 steps of the official NeurIPS'23 streaming runbook, whereas CTR, a conformal guarantee averaged over queries, left up to 16.4% of queries below the target. Where HNSW tuned to an average recall of 0.99 met that target, PQR-Search had 2.5x its single-query latency and 1.3x lower batch throughput, yet that HNSW still left 3-29% of queries below 0.99. PQR-Search was faster than FAISS exhaustive search in every static setting (26.4x geometric mean in batch; 69-154x at 100M scale), faster than IVF with nprobe chosen afterwards for every test query in all 52 main settings, and 27-76x faster at one thread than PUFFINN, which also gives per-query guarantees.

作者备注:66 pages, 15 figures, 19 tables. Extended version of a paper submitted to ICDE 2027

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-05 15:30 · 最新观测版本

Per-Query Recall Guarantees for Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search in Dynamic Vector Databases

Vector search runs as an operator in database systems, where a missed neighbor can make a filter, join, or aggregate wrong, yet approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) indexes are tuned only for an average recall target. In our measurements, indexes tuned to an average recall of 0.99 left 5-19% of in-distribution queries and, tuned without a query log, up to 99.6% of real out-of-distribution queries below this target, and the misses grew under updates. We present PQR-Search, a k-ANN search method that guarantees $\Pr[\mathrm{Recall}(q)<τ]\leδ$ for every query. The probability is only over a random orthogonal transformation inside the index, so no distributional assumption is needed, only that queries and updates do not depend on it; the guarantee holds after insertions and deletions without retuning. PQR-Search stores 1-bit codes of rotated residuals with respect to IVF centroids and prunes with exact quantiles of their error distribution. A formula predicting the fraction of vectors that pass the code test, with no data-fitted constants, chooses index parameters and maintenance operations without affecting the guarantee. On 20 datasets of up to 100 million vectors, failure rates stayed at most $δ$ in every audit, including all 33 steps of the official NeurIPS'23 streaming runbook, whereas CTR, a conformal guarantee averaged over queries, left up to 16.4% of queries below the target. Where HNSW tuned to an average recall of 0.99 met that target, PQR-Search had 2.5x its single-query latency and 1.3x lower batch throughput, yet that HNSW still left 3-29% of queries below 0.99. PQR-Search was faster than FAISS exhaustive search in every static setting (26.4x geometric mean in batch; 69-154x at 100M scale), faster than IVF with nprobe chosen afterwards for every test query in all 52 main settings, and 27-76x faster at one thread than PUFFINN, which also gives per-query guarantees.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗