跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.07826 · v1

Estimating Spectrum-Free Information Bounds for Generative Surrogates Beyond Conditional Collapse

首次提交 2026-11-05 19:07
版本更新 2026-11-05 19:07
雷达观测 2026-11-06 11:06
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Conditional generative surrogates in high-energy physics, such as models that predict reconstructed jets from partons, are often evaluated on $1\text{D}$ marginal divergences among other metrics. Taken alone these metrics can reward conditional collapse. On a CMS simulation benchmark, a sampler that ignores the conditioner beats a trained Mixture Density Network (MDN) on all four target marginals under both KL and Wasserstein-1, and cannot be stably separated from a Conditional Flow Matching (CFM) model on two of the four. We instead score the models with the Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Score (CRPSS) from forecast verification, taking the exact marginal as the reference. We show how global skill depends on the evaluation spectrum, and we also report it within bins of a conditioning variable, where that dependence largely goes away. We then introduce a data-driven $k$-Nearest-Neighbor ($k$-NN) extrapolation that estimates the best CRPS the conditioning information allows. Both models agree with this estimate on all four targets, which suggests that current architectures have reached the information available in the conditioner, at least as far as these per-target scores can tell.

作者备注:20 pages, 7 figures

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-05 19:07 · 最新观测版本

Estimating Spectrum-Free Information Bounds for Generative Surrogates Beyond Conditional Collapse

Conditional generative surrogates in high-energy physics, such as models that predict reconstructed jets from partons, are often evaluated on $1\text{D}$ marginal divergences among other metrics. Taken alone these metrics can reward conditional collapse. On a CMS simulation benchmark, a sampler that ignores the conditioner beats a trained Mixture Density Network (MDN) on all four target marginals under both KL and Wasserstein-1, and cannot be stably separated from a Conditional Flow Matching (CFM) model on two of the four. We instead score the models with the Continuous Ranked Probability Skill Score (CRPSS) from forecast verification, taking the exact marginal as the reference. We show how global skill depends on the evaluation spectrum, and we also report it within bins of a conditioning variable, where that dependence largely goes away. We then introduce a data-driven $k$-Nearest-Neighbor ($k$-NN) extrapolation that estimates the best CRPS the conditioning information allows. Both models agree with this estimate on all four targets, which suggests that current architectures have reached the information available in the conditioner, at least as far as these per-target scores can tell.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗