跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.08042 · v1

Secure Formal Raising: Protecting the Development of AI through Executable Properties

首次提交 2026-11-05 21:59
版本更新 2026-11-05 21:59
雷达观测 2026-11-06 12:09
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Model raising revisits Turing's developmental view of machine intelligence. Formal Raising (FR) has recently been proposed to complement this view with explicit behavioral properties. This paper extends that proposal to the security of the raising environment. Secure Formal Raising (SFR) models policy integrity, authorization, and confidential data flow using four-valued evidence that preserves unknown and inconsistent assessments. We prove six security invariants and show that they force admission to accept only confirmed evidence. A plain-C reference implementation satisfies the invariants in a bounded exhaustive exploration, which also exposes a confused-deputy gap for tool calls that a provenance requirement closes.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-05 21:59 · 最新观测版本

Secure Formal Raising: Protecting the Development of AI through Executable Properties

Model raising revisits Turing's developmental view of machine intelligence. Formal Raising (FR) has recently been proposed to complement this view with explicit behavioral properties. This paper extends that proposal to the security of the raising environment. Secure Formal Raising (SFR) models policy integrity, authorization, and confidential data flow using four-valued evidence that preserves unknown and inconsistent assessments. We prove six security invariants and show that they force admission to accept only confirmed evidence. A plain-C reference implementation satisfies the invariants in a bounded exhaustive exploration, which also exposes a confused-deputy gap for tool calls that a provenance requirement closes.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗