← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.08048 · v1
Performance metrics in machine learning: a scenario-based guide from the confusion matrix to calibration, regression and uncertainty
首次提交 2026-11-05 22:02
版本更新 2026-11-05 22:02
雷达观测 2026-11-06 12:09
摘要
Performance metrics can yield different conclusions from the same predictions. This methodological tutorial explains the effects of class prevalence, decision thresholds, aggregation rules and software conventions through controlled scenarios. Twenty-two confusion-matrix metrics are organized in a prevalence-coded map. Fifteen scenarios cover binary and multi-class classification, score discrimination, probability calibration, regression, uncertainty and consistency checks. Inputs are fixed in released files, and one factor is varied in each scenario. All 205 verification checks passed; 202 were independent and 3 were internal. An always-negative rule achieved an accuracy of 0.990 at a prevalence of 0.010, with balanced accuracy of 0.500. At fixed sensitivity and specificity, precision fell from 0.889 to 0.008 as prevalence fell from 0.5 to 0.001. Three probability variants shared a ROC-AUC of 0.825 but had calibration slopes of 2.08, 1.04 and 0.52. With 10 participants, participant-majority accuracy of 0.700 had a 95% interval of 0.348-0.933. Fold-averaged scores were falsely flagged as inconsistent under an inappropriate pooled-test-set model. A goal-based metric table and a reporting checklist are provided. The scenarios illustrate mechanisms and do not estimate their frequency in published studies. A literature audit and a real-data demonstration are specified as future protocols and were not executed.
作者备注：41 pages, 7 figures, 23 tables, including appendices
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-05 22:02 · 最新观测版本
Performance metrics in machine learning: a scenario-based guide from the confusion matrix to calibration, regression and uncertainty
Performance metrics can yield different conclusions from the same predictions. This methodological tutorial explains the effects of class prevalence, decision thresholds, aggregation rules and software conventions through controlled scenarios. Twenty-two confusion-matrix metrics are organized in a prevalence-coded map. Fifteen scenarios cover binary and multi-class classification, score discrimination, probability calibration, regression, uncertainty and consistency checks. Inputs are fixed in released files, and one factor is varied in each scenario. All 205 verification checks passed; 202 were independent and 3 were internal. An always-negative rule achieved an accuracy of 0.990 at a prevalence of 0.010, with balanced accuracy of 0.500. At fixed sensitivity and specificity, precision fell from 0.889 to 0.008 as prevalence fell from 0.5 to 0.001. Three probability variants shared a ROC-AUC of 0.825 but had calibration slopes of 2.08, 1.04 and 0.52. With 10 participants, participant-majority accuracy of 0.700 had a 95% interval of 0.348-0.933. Fold-averaged scores were falsely flagged as inconsistent under an inappropriate pooled-test-set model. A goal-based metric table and a reporting checklist are provided. The scenarios illustrate mechanisms and do not estimate their frequency in published studies. A literature audit and a real-data demonstration are specified as future protocols and were not executed.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗