跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.08114 · v1

Sum-of-Squares Refutation Implies Planted Recovery for Semirandom CSPs

首次提交 2026-11-05 22:48
版本更新 2026-11-05 22:48
雷达观测 2026-11-06 12:09
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We give a $n^{O(\ell)}$-time algorithm for solving semirandom planted instances of a $k$-ary Boolean constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) with $m \gtrsim \left(\frac{n}{\ell}\right)^{k/2} \ell \, \mathrm{polylog}(n)$ constraints, for any choice of the runtime parameter $\ell$. Up to $\mathrm{polylog}(n)$ factors, this matches the known runtime vs.\ number of constraints trade-off for refuting semirandom CSPs, as well as the trade-off for solving fully random planted CSPs. Prior work on designing algorithms for semirandom CSPs follows a high-level blueprint of decomposing the constraint hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ of the instance into pieces, each with an explicit pseudorandom property that allows the standard algorithm for random CSPs to succeed on every piece. We depart considerably from this framework and instead implicitly \emph{learn} such a decomposition, without appealing directly to explicit properties such as expansion. More generally, we construct such a learning algorithm from the assumption that semirandom $k$-XOR has Sum-of-Squares certificates of refutation. This yields the broader implication that any Sum-of-Squares refutation algorithm for semirandom $k$-XOR gives a corresponding algorithm for solving semirandom planted CSPs, and instantiating this reduction with known Sum-of-Squares algorithms for refuting semirandom $k$-XOR gives our main algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reduction from search to refutation for (semi)random CSPs.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-05 22:48 · 最新观测版本

Sum-of-Squares Refutation Implies Planted Recovery for Semirandom CSPs

We give a $n^{O(\ell)}$-time algorithm for solving semirandom planted instances of a $k$-ary Boolean constraint satisfaction problem (CSP) with $m \gtrsim \left(\frac{n}{\ell}\right)^{k/2} \ell \, \mathrm{polylog}(n)$ constraints, for any choice of the runtime parameter $\ell$. Up to $\mathrm{polylog}(n)$ factors, this matches the known runtime vs.\ number of constraints trade-off for refuting semirandom CSPs, as well as the trade-off for solving fully random planted CSPs. Prior work on designing algorithms for semirandom CSPs follows a high-level blueprint of decomposing the constraint hypergraph $\mathcal{H}$ of the instance into pieces, each with an explicit pseudorandom property that allows the standard algorithm for random CSPs to succeed on every piece. We depart considerably from this framework and instead implicitly \emph{learn} such a decomposition, without appealing directly to explicit properties such as expansion. More generally, we construct such a learning algorithm from the assumption that semirandom $k$-XOR has Sum-of-Squares certificates of refutation. This yields the broader implication that any Sum-of-Squares refutation algorithm for semirandom $k$-XOR gives a corresponding algorithm for solving semirandom planted CSPs, and instantiating this reduction with known Sum-of-Squares algorithms for refuting semirandom $k$-XOR gives our main algorithm. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reduction from search to refutation for (semi)random CSPs.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗