← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.08231 · v1
From Twisted Facts to Rogue Agents: Can LLMs Reliably Detect Multi-Dimensional Hallucinations?
首次提交 2026-11-06 00:15
版本更新 2026-11-06 00:15
雷达观测 2026-11-06 12:09
摘要
Large language models (LLMs) are widely used for information access, content production, and agent-based task execution, but their outputs remain vulnerable to subtle, high-risk hallucinations. To systematically evaluate and advance post-generation hallucination detection, we introduce HaluCheck, a large-scale, bilingual benchmark comprising over 42k instances spanning both factual hallucinations in text and faithfulness hallucinations in agent trajectories. HaluCheck features fine-grained, multi-level annotations for detection, localization, and correction, covering different tasks and perturbation degrees. Experiments on fourteen LLMs reveal that, while models show basic sample-level detection ability, they struggle with fine-grained localization, correction, and agent hallucination detection. Further analysis demonstrates that thinking, web search, and supervised fine-tuning each offer partial improvements, but none fully solve the problem. HaluCheck thus provides a solid basis for benchmarking and diagnosing LLM reliability across text and agent scenarios.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-06 00:15 · 最新观测版本
From Twisted Facts to Rogue Agents: Can LLMs Reliably Detect Multi-Dimensional Hallucinations?
Large language models (LLMs) are widely used for information access, content production, and agent-based task execution, but their outputs remain vulnerable to subtle, high-risk hallucinations. To systematically evaluate and advance post-generation hallucination detection, we introduce HaluCheck, a large-scale, bilingual benchmark comprising over 42k instances spanning both factual hallucinations in text and faithfulness hallucinations in agent trajectories. HaluCheck features fine-grained, multi-level annotations for detection, localization, and correction, covering different tasks and perturbation degrees. Experiments on fourteen LLMs reveal that, while models show basic sample-level detection ability, they struggle with fine-grained localization, correction, and agent hallucination detection. Further analysis demonstrates that thinking, web search, and supervised fine-tuning each offer partial improvements, but none fully solve the problem. HaluCheck thus provides a solid basis for benchmarking and diagnosing LLM reliability across text and agent scenarios.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗