跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.08403 · v1

StepBack: Step-Level Error-Localized Resampling for Efficient Test-Time Reasoning

首次提交 2026-11-06 02:12
版本更新 2026-11-06 02:12
雷达观测 2026-11-06 12:09
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Self-consistency (SC) is a widely used decoding strategy for improving chain-of-thought reasoning, but it requires sampling many complete reasoning trajectories with a preset budget. Its efficient variants reduce the cost mainly by stopping full-trajectory sampling early or distributing the number of samples across questions. In this paper, we propose StepBack, a step-level error-localized resampling method for efficient test-time reasoning. Given a small set of draft trajectories, StepBack localizes likely first error positions using lightweight signals and then resamples the detected error step and its suffix, followed by majority answer voting. Empirically, StepBack matches the accuracy of SC on average across seven mathematical reasoning and multi-hop QA benchmarks, while reducing token usage by up to 41.26%. In addition, by nature, StepBack can be combined with adaptive inference methods such as Adaptive Consistency, further improving their inference-time efficiency.

作者备注:NeurIPS 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

StepBack 通过轻量信号定位草稿推理轨迹中可能的首次出错步骤,并只重采样该步骤及其后续片段,从而在保持自一致性准确率的同时降低推理 token 消耗。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 02:12 · 最新观测版本

StepBack: Step-Level Error-Localized Resampling for Efficient Test-Time Reasoning

Self-consistency (SC) is a widely used decoding strategy for improving chain-of-thought reasoning, but it requires sampling many complete reasoning trajectories with a preset budget. Its efficient variants reduce the cost mainly by stopping full-trajectory sampling early or distributing the number of samples across questions. In this paper, we propose StepBack, a step-level error-localized resampling method for efficient test-time reasoning. Given a small set of draft trajectories, StepBack localizes likely first error positions using lightweight signals and then resamples the detected error step and its suffix, followed by majority answer voting. Empirically, StepBack matches the accuracy of SC on average across seven mathematical reasoning and multi-hop QA benchmarks, while reducing token usage by up to 41.26%. In addition, by nature, StepBack can be combined with adaptive inference methods such as Adaptive Consistency, further improving their inference-time efficiency.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗