跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.08431 · v1

Scaffolding GenAI Use in Ethical Essay Writing: A Three-Year Experience Report in Introductory Computing

首次提交 2026-11-06 02:24
版本更新 2026-11-06 02:24
雷达观测 2026-11-06 12:09
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

As society, ethics, and professional practice become increasingly integrated across the computer science curriculum, technical courses need practical ways to support ethical reasoning. Ethical essay assignments offer one approach, but little is known about how students use GenAI when writing such essays. This experience report examines GenAI use across three years of ethical essay assignments in a large first-year computer systems course. Across six post-essay surveys from 2024 to 2026, we analyzed 1,894 responses, linked survey data with essay grades in 2025 and 2026, and introduced a scaffolded responsible-use workflow in 2026. Under voluntary-use policies, AI adoption remained steady at around two-thirds of students, rising above 90% when use was scaffolded. Students reported mainly using AI for help with grammar and style, while tool use diversified beyond ChatGPT in 2026. Grade-linked analyses showed that AI use did not independently predict essay quality, while marker evaluations indicated high levels of critical engagement when use was scaffolded. Overall, GenAI's pedagogical value appears to depend on how assessment design guides students to evaluate and critically engage with AI-generated suggestions.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

该经验报告基于三年六次调查与成绩关联分析,探讨在一年级计算机系统课程的伦理短文作业中,如何通过支架式负责任使用流程引导学生使用生成式AI。

正在读取账号与研究记录…

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 02:24 · 最新观测版本

Scaffolding GenAI Use in Ethical Essay Writing: A Three-Year Experience Report in Introductory Computing

As society, ethics, and professional practice become increasingly integrated across the computer science curriculum, technical courses need practical ways to support ethical reasoning. Ethical essay assignments offer one approach, but little is known about how students use GenAI when writing such essays. This experience report examines GenAI use across three years of ethical essay assignments in a large first-year computer systems course. Across six post-essay surveys from 2024 to 2026, we analyzed 1,894 responses, linked survey data with essay grades in 2025 and 2026, and introduced a scaffolded responsible-use workflow in 2026. Under voluntary-use policies, AI adoption remained steady at around two-thirds of students, rising above 90% when use was scaffolded. Students reported mainly using AI for help with grammar and style, while tool use diversified beyond ChatGPT in 2026. Grade-linked analyses showed that AI use did not independently predict essay quality, while marker evaluations indicated high levels of critical engagement when use was scaffolded. Overall, GenAI's pedagogical value appears to depend on how assessment design guides students to evaluate and critically engage with AI-generated suggestions.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗