跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.08506 · v2

Structure is in the zoom: probing neural symmetry through dimensionality scaling

首次提交 2026-09-16 11:08
版本更新 2026-11-09 12:05
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:18
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Scaling exponents of neural dimensionality are read as properties of the code, and used to compare representations and benchmark models against cortex. Yet one recording of 11,311 mouse V1 neurons gives 0.25, 0.30 or 0.35, depending only on how it is subsampled. We show that such an exponent measures the population and the probe together. We split it exactly into a floor, which random subsets of the same sizes give, and a shift, which a declared axis of stimulus classes adds. The usual random-subsample exponent is almost all floor. Stimulus direction lifts the exponent in every grating recording by reading both symmetry sectors of the code: orientation, which repeats every half turn, and direction, which does not. The lift lives in trial-to-trial fluctuations that differ between directions, while the class means, which linear decoders read, pull it down. Two measured terms, how much the classes' fluctuations overlap and how the means sit against them, account for the shift. They give its sign where it changes: in Allen Neuropixels recordings, whose class means mostly raise the exponent, and in macaque V1. In an XY lattice whose classes stay on one orbit, temperature flips the sign as the two terms say, and in GPT-2 the shift ranks the indirect-object circuit's name-mover and backup heads. Reported with its path, its floor and its shift, an exponent says how much structure a probe finds and what carries it. Our open tool, rung, reports all three for any labelled neural recording or language-model layer: https://github.com/adilamin89/structure-in-the-zoom

作者备注:Accepted at NeurReps 2026 (Symmetry and Geometry in Neural Representations), Proceedings of Machine Learning Research. 48 pages. Code, data and the rung tool: https://github.com/adilamin89/structure-in-the-zoom. Five-minute talk: https://youtu.be/S4kUtP37KLM

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v2 · 2026-11-09 12:05 · 最新观测版本

Structure is in the zoom: probing neural symmetry through dimensionality scaling

Scaling exponents of neural dimensionality are read as properties of the code, and used to compare representations and benchmark models against cortex. Yet one recording of 11,311 mouse V1 neurons gives 0.25, 0.30 or 0.35, depending only on how it is subsampled. We show that such an exponent measures the population and the probe together. We split it exactly into a floor, which random subsets of the same sizes give, and a shift, which a declared axis of stimulus classes adds. The usual random-subsample exponent is almost all floor. Stimulus direction lifts the exponent in every grating recording by reading both symmetry sectors of the code: orientation, which repeats every half turn, and direction, which does not. The lift lives in trial-to-trial fluctuations that differ between directions, while the class means, which linear decoders read, pull it down. Two measured terms, how much the classes' fluctuations overlap and how the means sit against them, account for the shift. They give its sign where it changes: in Allen Neuropixels recordings, whose class means mostly raise the exponent, and in macaque V1. In an XY lattice whose classes stay on one orbit, temperature flips the sign as the two terms say, and in GPT-2 the shift ranks the indirect-object circuit's name-mover and backup heads. Reported with its path, its floor and its shift, an exponent says how much structure a probe finds and what carries it. Our open tool, rung, reports all three for any labelled neural recording or language-model layer: https://github.com/adilamin89/structure-in-the-zoom

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗