跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.08714 · v1

Patching the Blind Spots: Reversible LLM Rule Overlay for Frozen Fraud Detectors

首次提交 2026-11-06 05:12
版本更新 2026-11-06 05:12
雷达观测 2026-11-09 10:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

In industrial tabular fraud classification, gradient-boosted trees remain state-of-the-art, but even a well-trained model has blind spots, and retraining the deployed model is not always safe. We propose a framework that patches such a model without modifying it: LLMs propose rules anchored on features the model underweights by SHAP, and the resulting noisy pool is screened for empirical support and calibrated into an additive, reversible log-lift overlay that runs at the production cut-off. Single-LLM benefit is high-variance and inverts between datasets, so we pool three diverse backbones by equal-weight logit averaging, trading peak gain for a bounded worst case. On a real-world e-commerce fraud detector trained on selection-biased data, continued training regresses even when carefully tuned, whereas the overlay gains on average +2.26% recall at equal precision ($Δ$R@P) and +1.60% precision at equal recall ($Δ$P@R) over production cut-offs spanning 30-57% precision and 23-63% recall. On a public benchmark of seven designed bias-shift variants it raises $Δ$P@R on every variant and keeps $Δ$R@P near neutral. Each amendment is a readable predicate naming the fraud pattern it covers.

作者备注:11 pages, 1 figure, 7 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 05:12 · 最新观测版本

Patching the Blind Spots: Reversible LLM Rule Overlay for Frozen Fraud Detectors

In industrial tabular fraud classification, gradient-boosted trees remain state-of-the-art, but even a well-trained model has blind spots, and retraining the deployed model is not always safe. We propose a framework that patches such a model without modifying it: LLMs propose rules anchored on features the model underweights by SHAP, and the resulting noisy pool is screened for empirical support and calibrated into an additive, reversible log-lift overlay that runs at the production cut-off. Single-LLM benefit is high-variance and inverts between datasets, so we pool three diverse backbones by equal-weight logit averaging, trading peak gain for a bounded worst case. On a real-world e-commerce fraud detector trained on selection-biased data, continued training regresses even when carefully tuned, whereas the overlay gains on average +2.26% recall at equal precision ($Δ$R@P) and +1.60% precision at equal recall ($Δ$P@R) over production cut-offs spanning 30-57% precision and 23-63% recall. On a public benchmark of seven designed bias-shift variants it raises $Δ$P@R on every variant and keeps $Δ$R@P near neutral. Each amendment is a readable predicate naming the fraud pattern it covers.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗