跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.08779 · v1

Jacobian-Causal Memory Control for Persistent Memory in Language Model Systems

首次提交 2026-11-06 07:02
版本更新 2026-11-06 07:02
雷达观测 2026-11-09 10:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Persistent-memory systems choose not only which records are retrieved but which prior information can alter current inference. We propose Jacobian-causal memory control (JCMC), which represents each authorized memory intervention by a predicted influence signature in a shared behavioral measurement space, selects interventions against a target effect and side-effect budget, and compares predicted with observed effects before retaining or rolling back the intervention. Under explicit smoothness and bounded-estimation assumptions, we prove a quadratic local-approximation bound, characterize the target effects reachable by a set of signatures, bound selection regret under signature error, and bound non-additive interactions between simultaneous memories. The paper reports no benchmark measurements; it defines a paired counterfactual estimator and an evaluation protocol comparing JCMC with relevance, graph, and policy-filtered retrieval baselines. The central claim is narrowed or falsified if those simpler baselines match effect targeting, side-effect control, and rollback utility under equal model, memory, policy, and cost budgets.

作者备注:Architecture and formal analysis preprint. Four conditional theorems; no benchmark measurements. Companion research essay: https://achiral.ai/research/jacobian-causal-memory-control

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 07:02 · 最新观测版本

Jacobian-Causal Memory Control for Persistent Memory in Language Model Systems

Persistent-memory systems choose not only which records are retrieved but which prior information can alter current inference. We propose Jacobian-causal memory control (JCMC), which represents each authorized memory intervention by a predicted influence signature in a shared behavioral measurement space, selects interventions against a target effect and side-effect budget, and compares predicted with observed effects before retaining or rolling back the intervention. Under explicit smoothness and bounded-estimation assumptions, we prove a quadratic local-approximation bound, characterize the target effects reachable by a set of signatures, bound selection regret under signature error, and bound non-additive interactions between simultaneous memories. The paper reports no benchmark measurements; it defines a paired counterfactual estimator and an evaluation protocol comparing JCMC with relevance, graph, and policy-filtered retrieval baselines. The central claim is narrowed or falsified if those simpler baselines match effect targeting, side-effect control, and rollback utility under equal model, memory, policy, and cost budgets.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗