跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.08818 · v1

Fuzzy-FedAvg: Server-Aware Client Selection for Federated Speech Emotion Recognition in Heterogeneous Environments

首次提交 2026-11-06 08:19
版本更新 2026-11-06 08:19
雷达观测 2026-11-09 10:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Federated speech emotion recognition (SER) is challenged by speaker-dependent, class-imbalanced data and by heterogeneous client devices. This paper proposes \textit{Fuzzy-FedAvg}, a server-aware framework in which the server learns Client Selection Weights (CSWs) through fuzzy Q-learning from global-model feedback. The same CSWs weight client accuracy, training time, and \divkpi{} in both client selection and aggregation, while a dedicated PCAS node manages stragglers through staleness-discounted deferred updates. On IEMOCAP and CREMA-D, \textit{Fuzzy-FedAvg} achieves higher unweighted average recall (UAR) than FedAvg in all configurations under severe non-IID conditions, and in 22 of 24 participation-level and 10 of 12 training-horizon configurations overall. It also outperforms FedProx and Oort, while SCAFFOLD and Power-of-Choice remain competitive, and it reduces cumulative training time by 81.2\% in a FedScale-based evaluation. The benefit is greatest under strong statistical heterogeneity and narrows as data become more balanced.

作者备注:Accepted in Neural Computing and Applications

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 08:19 · 最新观测版本

Fuzzy-FedAvg: Server-Aware Client Selection for Federated Speech Emotion Recognition in Heterogeneous Environments

Federated speech emotion recognition (SER) is challenged by speaker-dependent, class-imbalanced data and by heterogeneous client devices. This paper proposes \textit{Fuzzy-FedAvg}, a server-aware framework in which the server learns Client Selection Weights (CSWs) through fuzzy Q-learning from global-model feedback. The same CSWs weight client accuracy, training time, and \divkpi{} in both client selection and aggregation, while a dedicated PCAS node manages stragglers through staleness-discounted deferred updates. On IEMOCAP and CREMA-D, \textit{Fuzzy-FedAvg} achieves higher unweighted average recall (UAR) than FedAvg in all configurations under severe non-IID conditions, and in 22 of 24 participation-level and 10 of 12 training-horizon configurations overall. It also outperforms FedProx and Oort, while SCAFFOLD and Power-of-Choice remain competitive, and it reduces cumulative training time by 81.2\% in a FedScale-based evaluation. The benefit is greatest under strong statistical heterogeneity and narrows as data become more balanced.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗