跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.08997 · v1

Calibrating your confidence requires thinking of all the ways you could be wrong

首次提交 2026-11-06 13:11
版本更新 2026-11-06 13:11
雷达观测 2026-11-09 11:19
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

A primary limitation of modern deep learning is the miscalibration of model confidence; traditional architectures fundamentally lack a mechanism to quantify their own uncertainty. Larger models and larger datasets mitigate this issue, but they do not resolve the underlying structural deficiency. Bayesian methods offer a principled uncertainty-aware learning framework through stochastic parameters. Yet, despite the established benefits, the inherent computational overhead often compromises either scalability or quality. This trade-off currently prevents the widespread adoption of Bayesian methods. This Thesis bridges the gap between high-quality and low-complexity by introducing a novel distribution on parameter space: a degenerate Gaussian whose covariance is a projection matrix aligned with the null space of the Fisher information matrix. We demonstrate the scalability of this Bayesian posterior through two numerically efficient algorithms: one for posterior sampling and another for the direct computation of predictive confidence. Empirically, we show State-Of-The-Art confidence calibration and out-of-distribution detection for large models. We provide theoretical grounding for this approach. We study the degeneracies inherent in Amari's information geometry and highlight its most relevant component: the split of parameter's perturbations into two orthogonal subspaces. From this perspective, our posterior naturally emerges as the simplest choice that captures this split, assigning unitary variance to one subspace and zero variance to the other. Moreover, through the tools of differential geometry, we utilize this split to identify and rectify a critical misalignment issue of the non-linearized Laplace Approximation. Finally, with a focus on PAC-Bayes generalization bounds, we pave the way for a deeper understanding of the learning capabilities of overparametrized models.

作者备注:PhD Thesis, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 13:11 · 最新观测版本

Calibrating your confidence requires thinking of all the ways you could be wrong

A primary limitation of modern deep learning is the miscalibration of model confidence; traditional architectures fundamentally lack a mechanism to quantify their own uncertainty. Larger models and larger datasets mitigate this issue, but they do not resolve the underlying structural deficiency. Bayesian methods offer a principled uncertainty-aware learning framework through stochastic parameters. Yet, despite the established benefits, the inherent computational overhead often compromises either scalability or quality. This trade-off currently prevents the widespread adoption of Bayesian methods. This Thesis bridges the gap between high-quality and low-complexity by introducing a novel distribution on parameter space: a degenerate Gaussian whose covariance is a projection matrix aligned with the null space of the Fisher information matrix. We demonstrate the scalability of this Bayesian posterior through two numerically efficient algorithms: one for posterior sampling and another for the direct computation of predictive confidence. Empirically, we show State-Of-The-Art confidence calibration and out-of-distribution detection for large models. We provide theoretical grounding for this approach. We study the degeneracies inherent in Amari's information geometry and highlight its most relevant component: the split of parameter's perturbations into two orthogonal subspaces. From this perspective, our posterior naturally emerges as the simplest choice that captures this split, assigning unitary variance to one subspace and zero variance to the other. Moreover, through the tools of differential geometry, we utilize this split to identify and rectify a critical misalignment issue of the non-linearized Laplace Approximation. Finally, with a focus on PAC-Bayes generalization bounds, we pave the way for a deeper understanding of the learning capabilities of overparametrized models.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗