跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.09200 · v1

Structure and Lineage Evidence for Vietnamese Statutory Article Retrieval on DRiLL

首次提交 2026-11-06 17:21
版本更新 2026-11-06 17:21
雷达观测 2026-11-09 11:19
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

We study Vietnamese statutory Article retrieval on DRiLL using features for provision identity and local form, same-law support, and citation and lineage evidence. Across five random seeds, selectors sharing candidates, listwise Qwen evidence, and learner settings improve official $F_2$ from 71.77% to 72.91%, with the largest descriptive gain on two-Article questions. Added features account for 18.20% of the proposed selector's total decision-tree split gain, measured as training-objective reduction, mainly from same-law and citation evidence. Cases reveal base provisions and amendments, companion recovery, distractor removal, and failures. These findings motivate research on other datasets, representations, and learners without establishing individual feature effects or requiring LightGBM, hand-crafted scores, or explicit graphs.

作者备注:Accepted at SOICT 2026

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 17:21 · 最新观测版本

Structure and Lineage Evidence for Vietnamese Statutory Article Retrieval on DRiLL

We study Vietnamese statutory Article retrieval on DRiLL using features for provision identity and local form, same-law support, and citation and lineage evidence. Across five random seeds, selectors sharing candidates, listwise Qwen evidence, and learner settings improve official $F_2$ from 71.77% to 72.91%, with the largest descriptive gain on two-Article questions. Added features account for 18.20% of the proposed selector's total decision-tree split gain, measured as training-objective reduction, mainly from same-law and citation evidence. Cases reveal base provisions and amendments, companion recovery, distractor removal, and failures. These findings motivate research on other datasets, representations, and learners without establishing individual feature effects or requiring LightGBM, hand-crafted scores, or explicit graphs.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗