跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.09264 · v1

Nudging Decision Models: Do Digital Nudges Steer Fast, Generation-Free AI Agents?

首次提交 2026-11-06 18:21
版本更新 2026-11-06 18:21
雷达观测 2026-11-09 11:19
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

LLM-based agents increasingly automate business and consumer tasks but are slow and expensive. Decision models, a new class that chooses among options without generating text, are far faster and less costly. Developers call them "System One models," referencing dual process theory. We ask whether such models can be steered by digital nudges online and whether, as the theory predicts, automatic nudges affect them more than reflective ones. We adapted an online shopping experiment, previously run with humans and LLM agents, to three decision models (Jev, Decision-1, d1). Across 600 runs per model, they chose a preselected default in 97.5-99.9% and a product with social influence information in 75-96% of choices, versus 47-49% in the control. All responded more strongly to the automatic nudge, the opposite of what has been reported for reasoning-capable LLM agents. We provide first evidence that non-generative decision models are susceptible to digital nudges in a System 1 pattern, implying agent-type-specific nudge effects.

作者备注:Under Review

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 18:21 · 最新观测版本

Nudging Decision Models: Do Digital Nudges Steer Fast, Generation-Free AI Agents?

LLM-based agents increasingly automate business and consumer tasks but are slow and expensive. Decision models, a new class that chooses among options without generating text, are far faster and less costly. Developers call them "System One models," referencing dual process theory. We ask whether such models can be steered by digital nudges online and whether, as the theory predicts, automatic nudges affect them more than reflective ones. We adapted an online shopping experiment, previously run with humans and LLM agents, to three decision models (Jev, Decision-1, d1). Across 600 runs per model, they chose a preselected default in 97.5-99.9% and a product with social influence information in 75-96% of choices, versus 47-49% in the control. All responded more strongly to the automatic nudge, the opposite of what has been reported for reasoning-capable LLM agents. We provide first evidence that non-generative decision models are susceptible to digital nudges in a System 1 pattern, implying agent-type-specific nudge effects.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗