跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.09627 · v1

What remains of the planar induced minor conjectures?

首次提交 2026-11-06 23:46
版本更新 2026-11-06 23:46
雷达观测 2026-11-09 13:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Dallard, Milanič, and Štorgel, and independently Gartland and Lokshtanov, conjectured that for every planar graph $H$, Maximum Weight Independent Set and List $3$-Coloring are polynomial-time solvable in $H$-induced-minor-free graphs. As a structural explanation, Gartland and Lokshtanov further conjectured that such graphs admit balanced separators dominated by a constant number of vertices. Bonnet and Chang recently refuted the independent-set part of the algorithmic conjecture, by showing that Maximum Independent Set is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard in graphs excluding the $5\times5$ grid as an induced minor. We revisit both conjectures. We show that the graphs used by Bonnet and Chang exclude much simpler planar graphs, including several $16$-vertex trees, and we introduce a second, independent family of hard instances. We also prove that $3$-Coloring is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard in both settings, thus refuting the algorithmic conjecture in full, even in its quasipolynomial version, unless $\mathsf{NP}\subseteq\mathsf{QP}$. On the structural side, we identify planar graphs $H$ for which the structural conjecture holds, while the algorithmic one fails. Thus, constantly dominated balanced separators cannot by themselves explain the tractability of Maximum Weight Independent Set and List $3$-Coloring.

作者备注:26 pages, 7 figures

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 23:46 · 最新观测版本

What remains of the planar induced minor conjectures?

Dallard, Milanič, and Štorgel, and independently Gartland and Lokshtanov, conjectured that for every planar graph $H$, Maximum Weight Independent Set and List $3$-Coloring are polynomial-time solvable in $H$-induced-minor-free graphs. As a structural explanation, Gartland and Lokshtanov further conjectured that such graphs admit balanced separators dominated by a constant number of vertices. Bonnet and Chang recently refuted the independent-set part of the algorithmic conjecture, by showing that Maximum Independent Set is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard in graphs excluding the $5\times5$ grid as an induced minor. We revisit both conjectures. We show that the graphs used by Bonnet and Chang exclude much simpler planar graphs, including several $16$-vertex trees, and we introduce a second, independent family of hard instances. We also prove that $3$-Coloring is $\mathsf{NP}$-hard in both settings, thus refuting the algorithmic conjecture in full, even in its quasipolynomial version, unless $\mathsf{NP}\subseteq\mathsf{QP}$. On the structural side, we identify planar graphs $H$ for which the structural conjecture holds, while the algorithmic one fails. Thus, constantly dominated balanced separators cannot by themselves explain the tractability of Maximum Weight Independent Set and List $3$-Coloring.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗