跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10056 · v1

Safety Direction Adapter: A Training-Free Post-Hoc Safety Patch for Fine-Tuned Open-Weight LLMs

首次提交 2026-11-06 08:36
版本更新 2026-11-06 08:36
雷达观测 2026-11-10 10:12
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Open-weight LLMs are routinely fine-tuned from public repositories, yet task-specific adaptation can silently erode safety alignment inherited from instruct-tuned bases. This is a supply-chain risk when organizations ship third-party checkpoints without full re-alignment. Prior work rarely audits diverse public fine-tunes under a shared multi-axis safety-utility protocol or offers training-free mitigation at deployment time. We propose Safety Direction Adapter (SDA), a training-free post-hoc safety patch that extracts a safety direction once from an aligned base and transfers it one-to-many within that base family as a small PEFT-compatible weight update, evaluated under the same multi-axis protocol. Across six direction extractors, we evaluate 14 checkpoints from two 1-2B lineages and probe 8B and 27B fleets (n=5 each) on 15 benchmarks (12538 prompts). On Llama, SDA improves the four-axis mean by about 2.3 points against a 4.2-point instruct-relative gap (about 55 percent recovery; partial Avg), with Safety and Cyber recovering toward or beyond instruct; Safety gains about 8.5 points against about 4.9 points mean degradation. On Qwen, degradation is larger and excess-driven; SDA still lifts Avg (about 36 percent of the gap) while trading Safety and Cyber against Excess and General. We report dual-use risks of publishing direction adapters and do not claim robustness to adaptive or white-box attacks.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-06 08:36 · 最新观测版本

Safety Direction Adapter: A Training-Free Post-Hoc Safety Patch for Fine-Tuned Open-Weight LLMs

Open-weight LLMs are routinely fine-tuned from public repositories, yet task-specific adaptation can silently erode safety alignment inherited from instruct-tuned bases. This is a supply-chain risk when organizations ship third-party checkpoints without full re-alignment. Prior work rarely audits diverse public fine-tunes under a shared multi-axis safety-utility protocol or offers training-free mitigation at deployment time. We propose Safety Direction Adapter (SDA), a training-free post-hoc safety patch that extracts a safety direction once from an aligned base and transfers it one-to-many within that base family as a small PEFT-compatible weight update, evaluated under the same multi-axis protocol. Across six direction extractors, we evaluate 14 checkpoints from two 1-2B lineages and probe 8B and 27B fleets (n=5 each) on 15 benchmarks (12538 prompts). On Llama, SDA improves the four-axis mean by about 2.3 points against a 4.2-point instruct-relative gap (about 55 percent recovery; partial Avg), with Safety and Cyber recovering toward or beyond instruct; Safety gains about 8.5 points against about 4.9 points mean degradation. On Qwen, degradation is larger and excess-driven; SDA still lifts Avg (about 36 percent of the gap) while trading Safety and Cyber against Excess and General. We report dual-use risks of publishing direction adapters and do not claim robustness to adaptive or white-box attacks.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗