跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10198 · v1

BO-Arena: An Evolving Benchmark for High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation

首次提交 2026-11-07 04:30
版本更新 2026-11-07 04:30
雷达观测 2026-11-10 10:11
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

High-dimensional Bayesian optimisation (HDBO) is an increasingly crowded field with new methods proposed at every major conference, making it ever harder to answer a deceptively simple question: "Which method is currently state-of-the-art?" In this paper, we question the efficacy of benchmarking practices in the field, and find them to be systematically ineffective: multiple published works fail to benchmark against the strongest available baselines, or even include incorrect implementations of key methods. Without a shared reference implementation, such errors are difficult to detect during peer review. We therefore introduce BO-Arena, an actively maintained and extensible package providing canonical implementations of state-of-the-art algorithms, which allows researchers to develop new methods and benchmark them rigorously. Using BO-Arena, we find that what currently drives performance in HDBO is even simpler than previously thought. We use these insights to propose a new algorithm which is competitive with the state of the art on problems with many observations, without resorting to the complex GP approximations used in recent methods. Finally, we question whether there is currently sufficient evidence that any more complex method outperforms a simple Gaussian process baseline for HDBO.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 04:30 · 最新观测版本

BO-Arena: An Evolving Benchmark for High-Dimensional Bayesian Optimisation

High-dimensional Bayesian optimisation (HDBO) is an increasingly crowded field with new methods proposed at every major conference, making it ever harder to answer a deceptively simple question: "Which method is currently state-of-the-art?" In this paper, we question the efficacy of benchmarking practices in the field, and find them to be systematically ineffective: multiple published works fail to benchmark against the strongest available baselines, or even include incorrect implementations of key methods. Without a shared reference implementation, such errors are difficult to detect during peer review. We therefore introduce BO-Arena, an actively maintained and extensible package providing canonical implementations of state-of-the-art algorithms, which allows researchers to develop new methods and benchmark them rigorously. Using BO-Arena, we find that what currently drives performance in HDBO is even simpler than previously thought. We use these insights to propose a new algorithm which is competitive with the state of the art on problems with many observations, without resorting to the complex GP approximations used in recent methods. Finally, we question whether there is currently sufficient evidence that any more complex method outperforms a simple Gaussian process baseline for HDBO.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗