跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10624 · v1

A Simple Computer-Assisted Proof of the 5/6-Bound for Real-Period Pinwheel Scheduling

首次提交 2026-11-07 18:02
版本更新 2026-11-07 18:02
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

In pinwheel scheduling with real periods, an instance consists of nn tasks with real periods 1≤a1≤a2≤⋯≤an1\le a_1\le a_2\le\cdots\le a_n. The goal is to find a schedule that assigns one task to each day indefinitely such that, for every task i∈{1,…,n}i\in\{1,\dots,n\} and every positive integer ℓ\ell, task ii occurs at least ℓ\ell times in every block of ⌈ℓai⌉\lceil\ell a_i\rceil consecutive days. Given an instance (a1,a2,…,an)(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n), its dimension is nn, its density is ∑i=1n1/ai\sum_{i=1}^n1/a_i, and its potential is ∑i=1n−11/ai\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}1/a_i. We prove that every real-valued instance of density at most 5/6 admits a periodic schedule of period length less than 4⋅2n4\cdot2^n. For integer periods, the 5/6 density bound was a long-standing conjecture settled by Kawamura using a computer-assisted proof [STOC 2024, PNAS 2026]. Our result confirms the real-period conjecture of Fujiwara, Miyagi, and Ouchi [DMTCS 2026]. Our computer-assisted proof builds on Kawamura's ideas while using fewer explicit schedules. It combines dimension reduction by folding with nine satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) checks over linear real arithmetic. A set of 14287 explicit periodic schedules contains a schedule for every instance of dimension at most 8 and density at most 5/6, and for every instance of dimension 9 and potential at most 5/6. Folding is used to reduce every instance of larger dimension and potential at most 5/6 to an instance of dimension 9 and the same potential bound. We also prove that every real-valued instance with minimum period at least 4 and density at most 17/20=0.85 admits a periodic schedule of period length less than 19⋅2n19\cdot2^n. The density bound 17/20 is tight and improves the 0.84-bound of Mishra, Rho, and Kleinberg [arXiv 2025] for integer periods. It also resolves the a1=4a_1=4 case of Kawamura's 2025 conjecture that integer-valued instances of density at most 1−(a1−1)/(a1(a1+1))1-(a_1-1)/(a_1(a_1+1)) are schedulable.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只收录了一个版本。收录下一版后,可以对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-07 18:02 · 最新观测版本

A Simple Computer-Assisted Proof of the 5/6-Bound for Real-Period Pinwheel Scheduling

In pinwheel scheduling with real periods, an instance consists of nn tasks with real periods 1≤a1≤a2≤⋯≤an1\le a_1\le a_2\le\cdots\le a_n. The goal is to find a schedule that assigns one task to each day indefinitely such that, for every task i∈{1,…,n}i\in\{1,\dots,n\} and every positive integer ℓ\ell, task ii occurs at least ℓ\ell times in every block of ⌈ℓai⌉\lceil\ell a_i\rceil consecutive days. Given an instance (a1,a2,…,an)(a_1,a_2,\dots,a_n), its dimension is nn, its density is ∑i=1n1/ai\sum_{i=1}^n1/a_i, and its potential is ∑i=1n−11/ai\sum_{i=1}^{n-1}1/a_i. We prove that every real-valued instance of density at most 5/6 admits a periodic schedule of period length less than 4⋅2n4\cdot2^n. For integer periods, the 5/6 density bound was a long-standing conjecture settled by Kawamura using a computer-assisted proof [STOC 2024, PNAS 2026]. Our result confirms the real-period conjecture of Fujiwara, Miyagi, and Ouchi [DMTCS 2026]. Our computer-assisted proof builds on Kawamura's ideas while using fewer explicit schedules. It combines dimension reduction by folding with nine satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) checks over linear real arithmetic. A set of 14287 explicit periodic schedules contains a schedule for every instance of dimension at most 8 and density at most 5/6, and for every instance of dimension 9 and potential at most 5/6. Folding is used to reduce every instance of larger dimension and potential at most 5/6 to an instance of dimension 9 and the same potential bound. We also prove that every real-valued instance with minimum period at least 4 and density at most 17/20=0.85 admits a periodic schedule of period length less than 19⋅2n19\cdot2^n. The density bound 17/20 is tight and improves the 0.84-bound of Mishra, Rho, and Kleinberg [arXiv 2025] for integer periods. It also resolves the a1=4a_1=4 case of Kawamura's 2025 conjecture that integer-valued instances of density at most 1−(a1−1)/(a1(a1+1))1-(a_1-1)/(a_1(a_1+1)) are schedulable.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗