← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.10769 · v1
Look Ahead: Search-Driven Reasoning in Embodied AI
首次提交 2026-11-07 22:58
版本更新 2026-11-07 22:58
雷达观测 2026-11-10 11:14
摘要
Search allows a robotic policy to evaluate candidate futures before committing to an action. Motivated by test-time planning for vision-language action (VLA) models, we study selective search over action chunks in PushT using a frozen Action Chunking with Transformers (ACT) policy. Beam search generates perturbed alternatives around the policy prediction and scores them through rollouts from cloned simulator states. Across 50 evaluation episodes, beam search raises task success from 0% to 18% and increases average cumulative reward from 39.44 to 103.2. We introduce One Step Ahead (OSA), a gate that simulates the nominal policy chunk and invokes full search only when its predicted coverage drop exceeds a threshold. In the reported ablations, OSA preserves or improves success while reducing runtime by approximately 3x relative to full beam search. Ablations over tree depth, branching factor, beam width, and replanning frequency show that larger search budgets do not consistently improve performance. The results support selective test-time search for action-chunking policies; evaluation on language-conditioned VLAs and physical robots remains future work.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-07 22:58 · 最新观测版本
Look Ahead: Search-Driven Reasoning in Embodied AI
Search allows a robotic policy to evaluate candidate futures before committing to an action. Motivated by test-time planning for vision-language action (VLA) models, we study selective search over action chunks in PushT using a frozen Action Chunking with Transformers (ACT) policy. Beam search generates perturbed alternatives around the policy prediction and scores them through rollouts from cloned simulator states. Across 50 evaluation episodes, beam search raises task success from 0% to 18% and increases average cumulative reward from 39.44 to 103.2. We introduce One Step Ahead (OSA), a gate that simulates the nominal policy chunk and invokes full search only when its predicted coverage drop exceeds a threshold. In the reported ablations, OSA preserves or improves success while reducing runtime by approximately 3x relative to full beam search. Ablations over tree depth, branching factor, beam width, and replanning frequency show that larger search budgets do not consistently improve performance. The results support selective test-time search for action-chunking policies; evaluation on language-conditioned VLAs and physical robots remains future work.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗