跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.10974 · v1

SWEET: Mitigating Spurious Feature Reliance in LLM Reasoning via Weight Editing

首次提交 2026-11-08 05:25
版本更新 2026-11-08 05:25
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Reasoning in large language models can be disrupted by simple input perturbations (e.g. adding irrelevant distractors), suggesting reliance on spurious correlations. Identifying and suppressing the spurious features involved in long chain-of-thought reasoning remains challenging. We introduce Spurious-feature WEight EdiTing (SWEET), a training-free method that combines counterfactual interventions with mechanistic interpretability to identify and suppress spurious-features. SWEET extracts token- and sequence-level behavioral directions from activation contrasts between original problems and their counterfactual variants - capturing local and global patterns of spurious reasoning. It then localizes the responsible MLP neurons and attention heads and suppresses their contributions along these directions through weight edits. Using only 20 original-counterfactual pairs for direction extraction, SWEET improves accuracy by an average of 11.8 percentage points on perturbed inputs and 2 points on original inputs across five open-weight reasoning models and five reasoning benchmarks. It also reduces the relative gap between original and perturbed accuracies from 17.6% to 2.5%. Analyses identify two recurring forms of spurious reasoning, i.e. over-integrating irrelevant conditions and overthinking, and provide mechanistic evidence that SWEET improves reasoning robustness by suppressing both behavioral directions.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-08 05:25 · 最新观测版本

SWEET: Mitigating Spurious Feature Reliance in LLM Reasoning via Weight Editing

Reasoning in large language models can be disrupted by simple input perturbations (e.g. adding irrelevant distractors), suggesting reliance on spurious correlations. Identifying and suppressing the spurious features involved in long chain-of-thought reasoning remains challenging. We introduce Spurious-feature WEight EdiTing (SWEET), a training-free method that combines counterfactual interventions with mechanistic interpretability to identify and suppress spurious-features. SWEET extracts token- and sequence-level behavioral directions from activation contrasts between original problems and their counterfactual variants - capturing local and global patterns of spurious reasoning. It then localizes the responsible MLP neurons and attention heads and suppresses their contributions along these directions through weight edits. Using only 20 original-counterfactual pairs for direction extraction, SWEET improves accuracy by an average of 11.8 percentage points on perturbed inputs and 2 points on original inputs across five open-weight reasoning models and five reasoning benchmarks. It also reduces the relative gap between original and perturbed accuracies from 17.6% to 2.5%. Analyses identify two recurring forms of spurious reasoning, i.e. over-integrating irrelevant conditions and overthinking, and provide mechanistic evidence that SWEET improves reasoning robustness by suppressing both behavioral directions.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗