跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.11179 · v1

Guidance at Pure Noise Erodes Speaker Similarity in Few-Step Token-Conditioned Flow-Matching TTS

首次提交 2026-11-08 14:41
版本更新 2026-11-08 14:41
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Text-to-speech systems built from a language model and a flow-matching mel decoder now run the decoder with two to four Euler steps instead of the official ten or more. At two steps the word error rate (WER) is unchanged, but speaker similarity (SIM) drops by one to six points. This paper shows that most of this loss comes from classifier-free guidance on the first step. At pure noise the network can only return the conditional mean, so guidance shifts every trajectory by nearly the same vector. Later steps do not remove this shift, and its size grows with the length of the first step, so it is negligible with ten or more steps and accounts for most of the loss with two. Two training-free samplers are derived from this analysis. First-step unguided sampling (FSU) leaves the first step unguided and recovers $84$--$91\%$ of the two-step SIM loss on CosyVoice~2/3 with no significant WER increase. FSU-Mid replaces the two Euler steps by one midpoint step with an unguided first evaluation, recovers $77$--$85\%$ on IndexTTS-2 and matches the ten-step teacher on CosyVoice~2 and GLM-TTS. Both use three network function evaluations, one fewer than the official two-step sampler, and FSU-Mid gives the highest mean recovery among eight published guidance rules re-run at two steps on four decoders.

作者备注:13 pages, 8 figures. Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing. Code: https://github.com/16jhlee/FSU

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-08 14:41 · 最新观测版本

Guidance at Pure Noise Erodes Speaker Similarity in Few-Step Token-Conditioned Flow-Matching TTS

Text-to-speech systems built from a language model and a flow-matching mel decoder now run the decoder with two to four Euler steps instead of the official ten or more. At two steps the word error rate (WER) is unchanged, but speaker similarity (SIM) drops by one to six points. This paper shows that most of this loss comes from classifier-free guidance on the first step. At pure noise the network can only return the conditional mean, so guidance shifts every trajectory by nearly the same vector. Later steps do not remove this shift, and its size grows with the length of the first step, so it is negligible with ten or more steps and accounts for most of the loss with two. Two training-free samplers are derived from this analysis. First-step unguided sampling (FSU) leaves the first step unguided and recovers $84$--$91\%$ of the two-step SIM loss on CosyVoice~2/3 with no significant WER increase. FSU-Mid replaces the two Euler steps by one midpoint step with an unguided first evaluation, recovers $77$--$85\%$ on IndexTTS-2 and matches the ten-step teacher on CosyVoice~2 and GLM-TTS. Both use three network function evaluations, one fewer than the official two-step sampler, and FSU-Mid gives the highest mean recovery among eight published guidance rules re-run at two steps on four decoders.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗