跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.11257 · v1

Learning calibrated probabilistic forecasts using Koopman mode decomposition and the continuous ranked probability score

首次提交 2026-11-08 17:20
版本更新 2026-11-08 17:20
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Well-calibrated forecasting for non-linear dynamical systems is essential in science and engineering applications such as fluid dynamics and weather prediction. We present a forecasting method combining probabilistic machine learning with the structured linear dynamics of Koopman mode decomposition. Within this framework, the observation, linear dynamics, and state reconstruction operators are constructed using standard machine learning architectures, producing predictive distributions via the pushforward of injected noise samples. The model is trained using a proper scoring rule, the continuous ranked probability score, to directly target calibrated, accurate forecasts. The approach is validated on two non-linear ordinary differential equation examples and two partial differential equation examples, vortex shedding and cavity flow, using both large and small, noisy datasets. Results demonstrate that known Koopman eigenfunctions and spectra can be identified and used for accurate forecasting. The model can also produce multi-modal predictive distributions, demonstrated for a trajectory initialised on the boundary between two basins of attraction. Uncertainty is captured by the sample ensemble spread, with spread--skill ratios close to one over the training horizon in several experiments, although for extended rollouts and noisy datasets, the ensemble may become under- or over-dispersed. In low-noise experiments, temporal rollout is generally accurate for at least twice the training horizon, and up to twenty times in some cases. Approximation quality is comparable to a deep ensemble approximation over the training horizon, but at a reduced computational cost and with better robustness in identifying Koopman eigenvalues.

作者备注:31 pages plus appendices. 18 figures and 5 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-08 17:20 · 最新观测版本

Learning calibrated probabilistic forecasts using Koopman mode decomposition and the continuous ranked probability score

Well-calibrated forecasting for non-linear dynamical systems is essential in science and engineering applications such as fluid dynamics and weather prediction. We present a forecasting method combining probabilistic machine learning with the structured linear dynamics of Koopman mode decomposition. Within this framework, the observation, linear dynamics, and state reconstruction operators are constructed using standard machine learning architectures, producing predictive distributions via the pushforward of injected noise samples. The model is trained using a proper scoring rule, the continuous ranked probability score, to directly target calibrated, accurate forecasts. The approach is validated on two non-linear ordinary differential equation examples and two partial differential equation examples, vortex shedding and cavity flow, using both large and small, noisy datasets. Results demonstrate that known Koopman eigenfunctions and spectra can be identified and used for accurate forecasting. The model can also produce multi-modal predictive distributions, demonstrated for a trajectory initialised on the boundary between two basins of attraction. Uncertainty is captured by the sample ensemble spread, with spread--skill ratios close to one over the training horizon in several experiments, although for extended rollouts and noisy datasets, the ensemble may become under- or over-dispersed. In low-noise experiments, temporal rollout is generally accurate for at least twice the training horizon, and up to twenty times in some cases. Approximation quality is comparable to a deep ensemble approximation over the training horizon, but at a reduced computational cost and with better robustness in identifying Koopman eigenvalues.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗