← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.11317 · v1
Understanding Spike Encoding across IoT Sensing Modalities: An Empirical Study
首次提交 2026-11-08 19:42
版本更新 2026-11-08 19:42
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
摘要
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) offer a path to energy-efficient sensing on Internet of Things (IoT) devices. The input encoder shapes that opportunity by changing the cues available for recognition and the work required to process them. We study these choices across wireless, inertial, surface electromyographic, and tactile sensing. For wireless activity recognition, interleaving reduces estimated energy for arithmetic in the network layers, latency from the prepared input window to returned scores, and energy on the graphics processing unit and system-on-chip (GPU/SoC) rail, compared with repeating the full window on Jetson AGX Orin. With the same input size at each SNN time step, repeating a compact input can yield higher mean development accuracy than interleaving. The inertial experiments show that higher accuracy can come at higher device cost. Direct input can also be faster and more accurate than an event encoder while using less energy on the measured rail, even when its estimated energy for arithmetic in the network layers is higher. Level crossings improve grasp recognition on a later day for previously observed users. In tactile slip detection, level crossings shift the balance between missed slips and false alarms, and checkpoint selection can reverse which input offers higher slip recall. We use these findings to outline how edge sensing systems can profile encoders against the signal structure, the errors that matter to the task, and the cost of the full inference pipeline.
作者备注：9 pages, 7 figures, 5 tables; includes supplementary material
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-08 19:42 · 最新观测版本
Understanding Spike Encoding across IoT Sensing Modalities: An Empirical Study
Spiking neural networks (SNNs) offer a path to energy-efficient sensing on Internet of Things (IoT) devices. The input encoder shapes that opportunity by changing the cues available for recognition and the work required to process them. We study these choices across wireless, inertial, surface electromyographic, and tactile sensing. For wireless activity recognition, interleaving reduces estimated energy for arithmetic in the network layers, latency from the prepared input window to returned scores, and energy on the graphics processing unit and system-on-chip (GPU/SoC) rail, compared with repeating the full window on Jetson AGX Orin. With the same input size at each SNN time step, repeating a compact input can yield higher mean development accuracy than interleaving. The inertial experiments show that higher accuracy can come at higher device cost. Direct input can also be faster and more accurate than an event encoder while using less energy on the measured rail, even when its estimated energy for arithmetic in the network layers is higher. Level crossings improve grasp recognition on a later day for previously observed users. In tactile slip detection, level crossings shift the balance between missed slips and false alarms, and checkpoint selection can reverse which input offers higher slip recall. We use these findings to outline how edge sensing systems can profile encoders against the signal structure, the errors that matter to the task, and the cost of the full inference pipeline.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗