跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.11469 · v1

RealEmbedBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Real-World Application-Layer Embedded Software Tasks

首次提交 2026-11-09 00:05
版本更新 2026-11-09 00:05
雷达观测 2026-11-10 12:16
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Large language models (LLMs) perform well on general coding tasks, but their capabilities in application-layer embedded software development remain underexplored. Existing embedded benchmarks primarily focus on hardware-in-the-loop validation in simulated environments. We introduce RealEmbedBench, a benchmark of 5,142 samples covering three application-layer tasks: code generation and completion, state machine modeling and implementation, and cross-OS code translation. We evaluate six representative LLMs and find substantial performance differences across tasks and models. Project context, especially the local code window, significantly affects code generation and completion. Models perform reasonably well at state machine modeling but struggle to translate these models into executable code. Cross-OS translation performance varies substantially by direction. Translation from Harmony to RT-Thread is particularly challenging, with an average pass rate of 0.1667. These findings suggest that developers should consider local code context when using LLMs for code generation and completion and select models according to the translation direction. They also motivate the use of more real-world state machine implementation data in LLM training to narrow the gap between modeling and executable code.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 00:05 · 最新观测版本

RealEmbedBench: Benchmarking LLMs on Real-World Application-Layer Embedded Software Tasks

Large language models (LLMs) perform well on general coding tasks, but their capabilities in application-layer embedded software development remain underexplored. Existing embedded benchmarks primarily focus on hardware-in-the-loop validation in simulated environments. We introduce RealEmbedBench, a benchmark of 5,142 samples covering three application-layer tasks: code generation and completion, state machine modeling and implementation, and cross-OS code translation. We evaluate six representative LLMs and find substantial performance differences across tasks and models. Project context, especially the local code window, significantly affects code generation and completion. Models perform reasonably well at state machine modeling but struggle to translate these models into executable code. Cross-OS translation performance varies substantially by direction. Translation from Harmony to RT-Thread is particularly challenging, with an average pass rate of 0.1667. These findings suggest that developers should consider local code context when using LLMs for code generation and completion and select models according to the translation direction. They also motivate the use of more real-world state machine implementation data in LLM training to narrow the gap between modeling and executable code.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗