← 研踪 PaperTrailarXiv:2611.11563 · v1
HydroTuring: A physics probe benchmark testing mass, energy, and momentum conservation in hydrologic models
首次提交 2026-11-09 03:08
版本更新 2026-11-09 03:08
雷达观测 2026-11-10 13:19
摘要
Hydrologic models, including deep learning systems now deployed for operational flood forecasting, are evaluated primarily by how closely their simulated hydrographs match observed streamflow. However, high hydrograph skill does not guarantee physical consistency: in a synthetic calibration experiment, a conceptual model that loses 15% of its water input to an unreported sink still reaches a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.93, and no shared benchmark tests whether models obey fundamental conservation laws. Here we introduce HydroTuring (v0.1.0), a black-box benchmark of 37 physics probes that test mass (24 probes), energy (7) and momentum (6) conservation in hydrologic models. Each probe runs a controlled experiment on forcing generated at run time from a recorded seed and applies binary pass or fail criteria validated against 18 physically exact and 59 deliberately broken reference models. Across 32 evaluated models (3 exact references, 7 AI-based models and 22 process-based models), only the 3 exact references pass every probe among the 28 models scored on 5 or more probes. Process-based and AI-based models pass similar shares of their scored probes (76% and 74%), and a pre-trained flood-forecasting LSTM fails 6 of the 11 runoff-only probes it can be scored on. Furthermore, 49% of all 1,184 model-probe pairs remain unscored because models omit the required state or flux variables, while the scored failures occur in perturbation responses and state bounds rather than long-term water-budget closure. HydroTuring provides a reproducible smoke test for model development, peer review and operational deployment under an open community protocol.
观测到的版本
相邻记录可能跳过中间版本；首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。
v1 · 2026-11-09 03:08 · 最新观测版本
HydroTuring: A physics probe benchmark testing mass, energy, and momentum conservation in hydrologic models
Hydrologic models, including deep learning systems now deployed for operational flood forecasting, are evaluated primarily by how closely their simulated hydrographs match observed streamflow. However, high hydrograph skill does not guarantee physical consistency: in a synthetic calibration experiment, a conceptual model that loses 15% of its water input to an unreported sink still reaches a Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency of 0.93, and no shared benchmark tests whether models obey fundamental conservation laws. Here we introduce HydroTuring (v0.1.0), a black-box benchmark of 37 physics probes that test mass (24 probes), energy (7) and momentum (6) conservation in hydrologic models. Each probe runs a controlled experiment on forcing generated at run time from a recorded seed and applies binary pass or fail criteria validated against 18 physically exact and 59 deliberately broken reference models. Across 32 evaluated models (3 exact references, 7 AI-based models and 22 process-based models), only the 3 exact references pass every probe among the 28 models scored on 5 or more probes. Process-based and AI-based models pass similar shares of their scored probes (76% and 74%), and a pre-trained flood-forecasting LSTM fails 6 of the 11 runoff-only probes it can be scored on. Furthermore, 49% of all 1,184 model-probe pairs remain unscored because models omit the required state or flux variables, while the scored failures occur in perturbation responses and state bounds rather than long-term water-budget closure. HydroTuring provides a reproducible smoke test for model development, peer review and operational deployment under an open community protocol.
查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗