跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.12116 · v1

Forecast Value Add: Reward-Based Action Selection over Probabilistic Demand Forecasts

首次提交 2026-11-09 17:30
版本更新 2026-11-09 17:30
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Strong machine-learning ensembles capture much of the trend, seasonality, and known events in demand, yet they can still understate peaks, miss moving events, or mistake temporary changes for shifts in demand level. We address this gap by framing forecast refinement as a reward-driven decision problem. For each forecast period, we let an agent choose among values already produced by the ensemble: its base forecast, distribution-free bounds, quantiles, and a bias-corrected estimate. We evaluate these choices against context-matched historical periods, accounting for calendar position, recurring and moving events, trend, price, and promotions. We then apply a structural seasonal guard to constrain adjustments and record the model, agent, and planner contributions to every published value. We evaluate our approach across five retail, consumer-goods, and direct-to-consumer deployments over nine months. Our refined forecasts reduce mean WMAPE by 6.3% compared with the stacked machine-learning forecast for every customer, with gains reaching 16.7%, and achieve the lowest error in 35 of 45 customer-months. Compared with statistical forecasts, our approach reduces mean error by 18.7%. These results demonstrate that context-aware, auditable action selection can add forecast value beyond a strong ensemble.

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 17:30 · 最新观测版本

Forecast Value Add: Reward-Based Action Selection over Probabilistic Demand Forecasts

Strong machine-learning ensembles capture much of the trend, seasonality, and known events in demand, yet they can still understate peaks, miss moving events, or mistake temporary changes for shifts in demand level. We address this gap by framing forecast refinement as a reward-driven decision problem. For each forecast period, we let an agent choose among values already produced by the ensemble: its base forecast, distribution-free bounds, quantiles, and a bias-corrected estimate. We evaluate these choices against context-matched historical periods, accounting for calendar position, recurring and moving events, trend, price, and promotions. We then apply a structural seasonal guard to constrain adjustments and record the model, agent, and planner contributions to every published value. We evaluate our approach across five retail, consumer-goods, and direct-to-consumer deployments over nine months. Our refined forecasts reduce mean WMAPE by 6.3% compared with the stacked machine-learning forecast for every customer, with gains reaching 16.7%, and achieve the lowest error in 35 of 45 customer-months. Compared with statistical forecasts, our approach reduces mean error by 18.7%. These results demonstrate that context-aware, auditable action selection can add forecast value beyond a strong ensemble.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗