跳到正文
研踪PaperTrail
← 研踪 PaperTrail

arXiv:2611.12571 · v1

More Papers, Not More Output: Collaboration and Publication Trends among Early-Career Researchers

首次提交 2026-11-09 23:31
版本更新 2026-11-09 23:31
雷达观测 2026-11-10 15:22
arXiv ↗PDF ↗

摘要

Concerns about publication pressure often assume that early-career researchers now produce more papers than comparable researchers did in the past. However, publication counts may give a misleading impression of individual publication output because research has become increasingly collaborative. Researchers can list more papers on their CVs not only by producing more work themselves, but also by working with more coauthors and sharing credit for the same papers. Whether the collaboration-adjusted output of early-career researchers has increased over time has rarely been examined empirically. This study addresses this gap by analysing publication records from more than 200,000 early-career researchers at Western research institutions across five major science, engineering, and health fields between 1996 and 2024. Recent cohorts appear on more papers than earlier cohorts, but they also work in much larger research teams. Once publication credit is divided among coauthors, collaboration-adjusted output remains stable or declines across all fields. These findings show that research evaluation metrics that ignore collaboration are increasingly poorly aligned with how scientific work is produced. Rising publication counts alone should therefore not be taken as evidence that early-career researchers are producing more individual publication output.

作者备注:29 pages, 6 figures, 6 tables

AI 论文解读

基于摘要 · 非全文审阅

此版本尚未生成 AI 解读。解读由后台任务生成并按论文版本保存,登录后共享已有结果。

版本差异

目前只观测到一个版本,无法比较变化。之后收录新版本时,会在这里对照标题、作者、分类和摘要。

观测到的版本

相邻记录可能跳过中间版本;首次发现 v2 及以上也会标为版本更新。

v1 · 2026-11-09 23:31 · 最新观测版本

More Papers, Not More Output: Collaboration and Publication Trends among Early-Career Researchers

Concerns about publication pressure often assume that early-career researchers now produce more papers than comparable researchers did in the past. However, publication counts may give a misleading impression of individual publication output because research has become increasingly collaborative. Researchers can list more papers on their CVs not only by producing more work themselves, but also by working with more coauthors and sharing credit for the same papers. Whether the collaboration-adjusted output of early-career researchers has increased over time has rarely been examined empirically. This study addresses this gap by analysing publication records from more than 200,000 early-career researchers at Western research institutions across five major science, engineering, and health fields between 1996 and 2024. Recent cohorts appear on more papers than earlier cohorts, but they also work in much larger research teams. Once publication credit is divided among coauthors, collaboration-adjusted output remains stable or declines across all fields. These findings show that research evaluation metrics that ignore collaboration are increasingly poorly aligned with how scientific work is produced. Rising publication counts alone should therefore not be taken as evidence that early-career researchers are producing more individual publication output.

查看此版本解读 →查看此版本原文 ↗